RVLGF
Price
$0.47
Change
+$0.01 (+2.17%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
95.17M
TORXF
Price
$38.63
Change
-$0.18 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.34B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RVLGF vs TORXF

Header iconRVLGF vs TORXF Comparison
Open Charts RVLGF vs TORXFBanner chart's image
Revival Gold
Price$0.47
Change+$0.01 (+2.17%)
Volume$275.11K
Capitalization95.17M
Torex Gold Resources
Price$38.63
Change-$0.18 (-0.46%)
Volume$20.15K
Capitalization3.34B
RVLGF vs TORXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TORXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RVLGF vs. TORXF commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RVLGF is a Hold and TORXF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (RVLGF: $0.46 vs. TORXF: $38.57)
Brand notoriety: RVLGF and TORXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RVLGF: 84% vs. TORXF: 56%
Market capitalization -- RVLGF: $95.17M vs. TORXF: $3.34B
RVLGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $95.17M. TORXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $92.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RVLGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTORXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RVLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TORXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TORXF is a better buy in the long-term than RVLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RVLGF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TORXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RVLGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TORXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RVLGF is a better buy in the short-term than TORXF.

Price Growth

RVLGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.24% price change this week, while TORXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2097.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

TORXF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.83% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TORXF($3.34B) has a higher market cap than RVLGF($95.2M). RVLGF YTD gains are higher at: 127.761 vs. TORXF (97.024). TORXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 484M vs. RVLGF (-9.33M). TORXF has more cash in the bank: 103M vs. RVLGF (3.05M). TORXF has higher revenues than RVLGF: TORXF (1.03B) vs RVLGF (0).
RVLGFTORXFRVLGF / TORXF
Capitalization95.2M3.34B3%
EBITDA-9.33M484M-2%
Gain YTD127.76197.024132%
P/E RatioN/A15.87-
Revenue01.03B-
Total Cash3.05M103M3%
Total DebtN/A326M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RVLGF vs TORXF: Fundamental Ratings
RVLGF
TORXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7814
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
9961
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10048
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RVLGF's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as TORXF (64). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to TORXF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RVLGF (100). This means that TORXF’s stock grew significantly faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (99). This means that TORXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RVLGF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as TORXF (38). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to TORXF’s over the last 12 months.

TORXF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (100). This means that TORXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RVLGFTORXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TORXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHCIX62.59N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Health Care I
JUEQX27.85N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Equity R4
FAKDX9.61N/A
N/A
Kempner Multi-Cap Deep Value Investor
PGROX72.78N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth A
HNCFX20.94N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth F

RVLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVLGF and WPM have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVLGF and WPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLGF
1D Price
Change %
RVLGF100%
-3.15%
WPM - RVLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
SA - RVLGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
TORXF - RVLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
AGI - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
RGLD - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
More

TORXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TORXF has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TORXF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TORXF
1D Price
Change %
TORXF100%
-0.17%
PAAS - TORXF
72%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
AEM - TORXF
71%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
RGLD - TORXF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
AGI - TORXF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
WPM - TORXF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
More