It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RVSB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RVSB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
RVSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.87% price change this week, while SNNF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.
RVSB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
SNNF is expected to report earnings on Nov 08, 2022.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
RVSB | SNNF | RVSB / SNNF | |
Capitalization | 99.6M | 21M | 474% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -20.774 | -10.811 | 192% |
P/E Ratio | 10.08 | 23.42 | 43% |
Revenue | 54.1M | 7.33M | 738% |
Total Cash | 22M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 186M | 51.5M | 361% |
RVSB | SNNF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RVSB's Valuation (35) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SNNF (52) in the null industry. This means that RVSB’s stock grew similarly to SNNF’s over the last 12 months.
RVSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SNNF (100) in the null industry. This means that RVSB’s stock grew similarly to SNNF’s over the last 12 months.
SNNF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVSB (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVSB’s over the last 12 months.
RVSB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SNNF (59) in the null industry. This means that RVSB’s stock grew similarly to SNNF’s over the last 12 months.
RVSB's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SNNF (22) in the null industry. This means that RVSB’s stock grew similarly to SNNF’s over the last 12 months.
RVSB | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago48% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
INDS | 38.51 | 0.14 | +0.36% |
Pacer Benchmark Industrial RE SCTR ETF | |||
IHI | 59.54 | 0.10 | +0.17% |
iShares US Medical Devices ETF | |||
PBTP | 25.42 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
Invesco 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | |||
PFFL | 9.99 | -0.03 | -0.31% |
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Lvrgd Pref Stk ETN | |||
KSA | 40.74 | -0.24 | -0.59% |
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RVSB has been loosely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RVSB jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RVSB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RVSB | 100% | N/A | ||
HOPE - RVSB | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
FLIC - RVSB | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
HTLF - RVSB | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
BMRC - RVSB | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
UMBF - RVSB | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNNF and CBKM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNNF and CBKM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SNNF | 100% | -0.72% | ||
CBKM - SNNF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
RVSB - SNNF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SMAL - SNNF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SGBLY - SNNF | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
SQCF - SNNF | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
More |