It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RVYL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOHU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RVYL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOHU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
RVYL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.78% price change this week, while SOHU (@Packaged Software) price change was -15.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.34%.
RVYL is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2023.
SOHU is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
RVYL | SOHU | RVYL / SOHU | |
Capitalization | 16.2M | 356M | 5% |
EBITDA | -3.84M | 24.6M | -16% |
Gain YTD | -57.812 | 22.356 | -259% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.20 | - |
Revenue | 54.7M | 601M | 9% |
Total Cash | 15.8M | 960M | 2% |
Total Debt | 65.7M | 35.3M | 186% |
RVYL | SOHU | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RVYL's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SOHU (39) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that RVYL’s stock grew similarly to SOHU’s over the last 12 months.
SOHU's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as RVYL (100) in the null industry. This means that SOHU’s stock grew similarly to RVYL’s over the last 12 months.
SOHU's SMR Rating (89) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as RVYL (100) in the null industry. This means that SOHU’s stock grew similarly to RVYL’s over the last 12 months.
RVYL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SOHU (61) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that RVYL’s stock grew similarly to SOHU’s over the last 12 months.
SOHU's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for RVYL (100) in the null industry. This means that SOHU’s stock grew significantly faster than RVYL’s over the last 12 months.
RVYL | SOHU | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago87% | 10 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that RVYL and RSKD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVYL and RSKD's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RVYL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RVYL | 100% | -5.65% | ||
RSKD - RVYL | 23% Poorly correlated | +6.29% | ||
NCTY - RVYL | 22% Poorly correlated | +6.31% | ||
SOHU - RVYL | 22% Poorly correlated | -6.75% | ||
GCTS - RVYL | 22% Poorly correlated | -8.96% | ||
HKIT - RVYL | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOHU has been loosely correlated with NTES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOHU jumps, then NTES could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOHU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SOHU | 100% | -6.75% | ||
NTES - SOHU | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
BILI - SOHU | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
COIN - SOHU | 34% Loosely correlated | -10.78% | ||
YMM - SOHU | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
COMP - SOHU | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |