RWCB
Price
$21.88
Change
+$0.31 (+1.44%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
SEBC
Price
$25.95
Change
+$0.65 (+2.57%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

RWCB vs SEBC

Header iconRWCB vs SEBC Comparison
Open Charts RWCB vs SEBCBanner chart's image
Redwood Capital Bancorp (CA)
Price$21.88
Change+$0.31 (+1.44%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Southeastern Banking
Price$25.95
Change+$0.65 (+2.57%)
Volume$220
CapitalizationN/A
RWCB vs SEBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
RWCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RWCB vs. SEBC commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWCB is a StrongBuy and SEBC is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (RWCB: $21.88 vs. SEBC: $25.95)
Brand notoriety: RWCB and SEBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RWCB: 13% vs. SEBC: 38%
Market capitalization -- RWCB: $38.11M vs. SEBC: $22.69M
RWCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $38.11M. SEBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RWCB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RWCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEBC is a better buy in the long-term than RWCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RWCB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RWCB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SEBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RWCB is a better buy in the short-term than SEBC.

Price Growth

RWCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.88% price change this week, while SEBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWCB($38.1M) has a higher market cap than SEBC($22.7M). SEBC YTD gains are higher at: 41.773 vs. RWCB (-1.533). RWCB has higher revenues than SEBC: RWCB (21M) vs SEBC (15.9M).
RWCBSEBCRWCB / SEBC
Capitalization38.1M22.7M168%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.53341.773-4%
P/E Ratio6.44N/A-
Revenue21M15.9M132%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RWCB vs SEBC: Fundamental Ratings
RWCB
SEBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2132
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4620
SMR RATING
1..100
5646
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5440
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4327
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RWCB's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as SEBC (50). This means that RWCB’s stock grew similarly to SEBC’s over the last 12 months.

SEBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as RWCB (46). This means that SEBC’s stock grew similarly to RWCB’s over the last 12 months.

SEBC's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as RWCB (56). This means that SEBC’s stock grew similarly to RWCB’s over the last 12 months.

SEBC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as RWCB (54). This means that SEBC’s stock grew similarly to RWCB’s over the last 12 months.

SEBC's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as RWCB (43). This means that SEBC’s stock grew similarly to RWCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RWCBSEBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
53%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RWCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWV43.432.17
+5.27%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan
XHYH34.98N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US High Yield Hlthcr Sctr ETF
BFOR73.04-2.84
-3.74%
Barron's 400 ETF
COWG32.00-1.33
-3.99%
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
ITB106.15-4.53
-4.09%
iShares US Home Construction ETF

RWCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RWCB and SCZC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RWCB and SCZC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RWCB
1D Price
Change %
RWCB100%
+1.44%
SCZC - RWCB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OZK - RWCB
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
HMST - RWCB
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.16%
SFDL - RWCB
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
SABK - RWCB
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More

SEBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEBC and PEBC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEBC and PEBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEBC
1D Price
Change %
SEBC100%
+2.57%
PEBC - SEBC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKFL - SEBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RWCB - SEBC
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
SFDL - SEBC
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
SCZC - SEBC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More