Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMCX vs VTSMX
RWMCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts RWMCX vs VTSMX
American Funds Washington Mutual R3
Price$66.54
Change+$0.17 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.01B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$160.59
Change+$0.10 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95T
RWMCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.95T vs. RWMCX (209B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than RWMCX: VTSMX (1.04) vs RWMCX (0.90). RWMCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: RWMCX (23 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). RWMCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). RWMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). RWMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: RWMCX (250) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.93 vs. RWMCX (6.38). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 94.50 vs. RWMCX (53.29).
| RWMCX | VTSMX | RWMCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.14 | 650% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.14 | 650% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.259 | 13.963 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3000 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 209B | 1.95T | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.04 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.38 | 17.93 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.42 | 74.14 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.29 | 94.50 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.62 | 236.17 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement