Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMEX vs WTRCX
RWMEX vs WTRCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMEX vs WTRCX
American Funds Washington Mutual R4
Price$65.66
Change+$0.63 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.17B
Macquarie Core Equity Fund
Price$12.96
Change+$0.11 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.68B
RWMEX vs WTRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMEX vs. WTRCX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMEX is a Hold and WTRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. WTRCX (3.68B). RWMEX pays higher dividends than WTRCX: RWMEX (1.16) vs WTRCX (0.00). RWMEX was incepted earlier than WTRCX: RWMEX (24 years) vs WTRCX (33 years). WTRCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.60). RWMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. WTRCX (24.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than WTRCX: RWMEX (250) vs WTRCX (1000). RWMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.17 vs. WTRCX (-8.02). RWMEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.03 vs. WTRCX (-2.97).
| RWMEX | WTRCX | RWMEX / WTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.74 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.76 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.500 | 11.149 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 202B | 3.68B | 5,489% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.17 | -8.02 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.01 | -0.16 | -16,383% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.03 | -2.97 | -1,447% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.84 | 2.64 | 2,642% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement