Ad is loading...
RWMFX vs SLGFX
RWMFX vs SLGFX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SLGFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$60.25
Change+$0.16 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets182.14B
SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT)
Price$18.55
Change+$0.13 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
RWMFX vs SLGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SLGFX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and SLGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. SLGFX (1.04B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SLGFX: RWMFX (1.53) vs SLGFX (1.13). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SLGFX: RWMFX (23 years) vs SLGFX (7 years). SLGFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SLGFX (4.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLGFX: RWMFX (250) vs SLGFX (100000). SLGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.52 vs. RWMFX (1.78). SLGFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.73 vs. RWMFX (55.93).
| RWMFX | SLGFX | RWMFX / SLGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.25 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.64 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.688 | -5.897 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 182B | 1.04B | 17,433% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.13 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.78 | 6.52 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.97 | 31.62 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.93 | 98.73 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.56 | N/A | - |