Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs SLYCX
RWMFX vs SLYCX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs SLYCX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
RWMFX vs SLYCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. SLYCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Hold and SLYCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. SLYCX (1.49B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than SLYCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs SLYCX (0.76). RWMFX was incepted earlier than SLYCX: RWMFX (24 years) vs SLYCX (11 years). SLYCX (0.72) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). SLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLYCX: RWMFX (250) vs SLYCX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. SLYCX (-5.17). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.02 vs. SLYCX (13.35).
| RWMFX | SLYCX | RWMFX / SLYCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.72 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.72 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.905 | 12.469 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 204B | 1.49B | 13,737% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.76 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | -5.17 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.92 | 17.59 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.02 | 13.35 | 337% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.75 | 20.68 | 352% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement