Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWMFX vs TCEPX
RWMFX vs TCEPX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TCEPX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$64.56
Change+$0.53 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets202.05B
Nuveen Equity Index Premier
Price$43.83
Change+$0.38 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.48B
RWMFX vs TCEPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TCEPX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and TCEPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 202B vs. TCEPX (53.5B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TCEPX: RWMFX (1.48) vs TCEPX (1.08). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TCEPX: RWMFX (23 years) vs TCEPX (16 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than TCEPX (0.20). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TCEPX (3.00). TCEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: TCEPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). TCEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.83 vs. RWMFX (7.88). TCEPX return over 5 years is better than : 103.01 vs. RWMFX (56.79).
| RWMFX | TCEPX | RWMFX / TCEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.20 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.20 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.739 | 7.059 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 202B | 53.5B | 378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.08 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.88 | 14.83 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.20 | 65.17 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.79 | 103.01 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.15 | 197.92 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement