Ad is loading...
RWMFX vs TCEPX
RWMFX vs TCEPX Comparison
Open Charts RWMFX vs TCEPX
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$58.48
Change-$0.12 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.97B
Nuveen Equity Index Premier
Price$36.72
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.06B
RWMFX vs TCEPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWMFX vs. TCEPX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWMFX is a Buy and TCEPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. TCEPX (45.1B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than TCEPX: RWMFX (1.53) vs TCEPX (1.20). RWMFX was incepted earlier than TCEPX: RWMFX (23 years) vs TCEPX (16 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than TCEPX (0.20). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. TCEPX (4.00). TCEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: TCEPX (0) vs RWMFX (250). TCEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.47 vs. RWMFX (0.00). TCEPX return over 5 years is better than : 88.53 vs. RWMFX (48.87).
| RWMFX | TCEPX | RWMFX / TCEPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.20 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.31 | 0.20 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.576 | -10.308 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 45.1B | 392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.20 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.00 | 5.47 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.14 | 20.38 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.87 | 88.53 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.20 | 146.78 | 34% |