RYKKF
Price
$24.53
Change
+$0.48 (+2.00%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.36B
WLWHY
Price
$3.38
Change
+$0.02 (+0.60%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.91B
Ad is loading...

RYKKF vs WLWHY

Header iconRYKKF vs WLWHY Comparison
Open Charts RYKKF vs WLWHYBanner chart's image
Ryohin Keikaku
Price$24.53
Change+$0.48 (+2.00%)
Volume$5.11K
Capitalization6.36B
Woolworths Holdings
Price$3.38
Change+$0.02 (+0.60%)
Volume$4.53K
Capitalization2.91B
RYKKF vs WLWHY Comparison Chart
Loading...
RYKKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLWHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RYKKF vs. WLWHY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYKKF is a Hold and WLWHY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (RYKKF: $24.53 vs. WLWHY: $3.38)
Brand notoriety: RYKKF and WLWHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RYKKF: 128% vs. WLWHY: 604%
Market capitalization -- RYKKF: $6.36B vs. WLWHY: $2.91B
RYKKF [@Department Stores] is valued at $6.36B. WLWHY’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $2.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $4.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RYKKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLWHY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RYKKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLWHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RYKKF is a better buy in the long-term than WLWHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RYKKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLWHY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RYKKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • WLWHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RYKKF is a better buy in the short-term than WLWHY.

Price Growth

RYKKF (@Department Stores) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while WLWHY (@Department Stores) price change was +9.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (-1.21% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RYKKF($6.36B) has a higher market cap than WLWHY($2.91B). RYKKF has higher P/E ratio than WLWHY: RYKKF (24.32) vs WLWHY (22.24). RYKKF YTD gains are higher at: 18.217 vs. WLWHY (-2.029). RYKKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.2B vs. WLWHY (8.61B). RYKKF has higher revenues than WLWHY: RYKKF (641B) vs WLWHY (76.5B).
RYKKFWLWHYRYKKF / WLWHY
Capitalization6.36B2.91B218%
EBITDA60.2B8.61B699%
Gain YTD18.217-2.029-898%
P/E Ratio24.3222.24109%
Revenue641B76.5B838%
Total Cash125BN/A-
Total Debt95.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RYKKF vs WLWHY: Fundamental Ratings
RYKKF
WLWHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8571
SMR RATING
1..100
58100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3820
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLWHY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RYKKF (49). This means that WLWHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RYKKF’s over the last 12 months.

WLWHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as RYKKF (85). This means that WLWHY’s stock grew similarly to RYKKF’s over the last 12 months.

RYKKF's SMR Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLWHY (100). This means that RYKKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLWHY’s over the last 12 months.

RYKKF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as WLWHY (61). This means that RYKKF’s stock grew similarly to WLWHY’s over the last 12 months.

WLWHY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as RYKKF (38). This means that WLWHY’s stock grew similarly to RYKKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RYKKFWLWHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RYKKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLWHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ODVYX38.250.19
+0.50%
Invesco Developing Markets Y
SMFCX27.400.12
+0.44%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr C
USIFX26.190.10
+0.38%
Victory International
CRFIX11.690.04
+0.34%
Calvert Focused Value I
SGAAX22.690.05
+0.22%
Virtus SGA Global Growth A

RYKKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RYKKF and RYKKY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RYKKF and RYKKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RYKKF
1D Price
Change %
RYKKF100%
N/A
RYKKY - RYKKF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGHY - RYKKF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
PMDKF - RYKKF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWRLY - RYKKF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKPYY - RYKKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLWHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLWHY and SRGHY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLWHY and SRGHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLWHY
1D Price
Change %
WLWHY100%
+0.75%
SRGHY - WLWHY
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
NWRLY - WLWHY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOKUY - WLWHY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYKKY - WLWHY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYKKF - WLWHY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More