Advertisement
RYLPF vs SNNUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYLPF is a Hold and SNNUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RYLPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNNUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RYLPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SNNUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RYLPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNNUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RYLPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SNNUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
RYLPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +2.80% price change this week, while SNNUF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.57%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.73% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| RYLPF | SNNUF | RYLPF / SNNUF | |
| Capitalization | 26.3B | 16.1B | 163% |
| EBITDA | 2.41B | 1.33B | 181% |
| Gain YTD | 9.267 | 40.558 | 23% |
| P/E Ratio | 147.31 | 31.68 | 465% |
| Revenue | 17.9B | 5.94B | 301% |
| Total Cash | 1.82B | 676M | 270% |
| Total Debt | 8.43B | 3.45B | 244% |
RYLPF | SNNUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 26 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNNUF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as RYLPF (16). This means that SNNUF’s stock grew similarly to RYLPF’s over the last 12 months.
SNNUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as RYLPF (100). This means that SNNUF’s stock grew similarly to RYLPF’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SNNUF (94). This means that RYLPF’s stock grew similarly to SNNUF’s over the last 12 months.
SNNUF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as RYLPF (45). This means that SNNUF’s stock grew similarly to RYLPF’s over the last 12 months.
RYLPF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNNUF (83). This means that RYLPF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNNUF’s over the last 12 months.
| RYLPF | SNNUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NULS.X | 0.018654 | 0.001270 | +7.31% |
| NULS cryptocurrency | |||
| WBTC.X | 112817.170000 | -3461.703100 | -2.98% |
| Wrapped Bitcoin cryptocurrency | |||
| 1INCH.X | 0.241263 | -0.008677 | -3.47% |
| 1inch Network cryptocurrency | |||
| DODO.X | 0.043320 | -0.001957 | -4.32% |
| DODO cryptocurrency | |||
| MANTA.X | 0.204106 | -0.013481 | -6.20% |
| Manta Network cryptocurrency | |||
RYLPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RYLPF has been loosely correlated with PHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RYLPF jumps, then PHG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RYLPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYLPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PHG - RYLPF | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| MBGNF - RYLPF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNNUF - RYLPF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RDGL - RYLPF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| RSCF - RYLPF | 5% Poorly correlated | +11.37% | ||
More | ||||
SNNUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNNUF and OTCFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNNUF and OTCFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNNUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNNUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OTCFF - SNNUF | 26% Poorly correlated | +69.64% | ||
| CSTL - SNNUF | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.21% | ||
| SAUHF - SNNUF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| SNN - SNNUF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.63% | ||
| BFLY - SNNUF | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.17% | ||
More | ||||