RZSMF vs STRYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RZSMF is a Hold and STRYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RZSMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RZSMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STRYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RZSMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- RZSMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
RZSMF (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +1.20% price change this week, while STRYF (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -3.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.30%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-3.87% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| RZSMF | STRYF | RZSMF / STRYF | |
| Capitalization | 411M | 264M | 156% |
| EBITDA | 116M | -168.61M | -69% |
| Gain YTD | 15.612 | 98.846 | 16% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.15 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 840M | 3.25B | 26% |
| Total Cash | 26.2M | 540M | 5% |
| Total Debt | 193M | 132M | 146% |
RZSMF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RZSMF | STRYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 7% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 6% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 21% | N/A |
RZSMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RZSMF and XLMDF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RZSMF and XLMDF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RZSMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RZSMF | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| XLMDF - RZSMF | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
| IFPJF - RZSMF | 2% Poorly correlated | +3.90% | ||
| PSORF - RZSMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| YLWDF - RZSMF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| STRYF - RZSMF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
STRYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that STRYF and PSO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STRYF and PSO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STRYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PSO - STRYF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.11% | ||
| IFJPY - STRYF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
| YLWDF - STRYF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DTRL - STRYF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| XLMDF - STRYF | -0% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
More | ||||