Ad is loading...
SACEX vs SPMGX
SACEX vs SPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SACEX vs. SPMGX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SACEX is a Hold and SPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPMGX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. SACEX (206M). SACEX pays higher dividends than SPMGX: SACEX (29.80) vs SPMGX (4.99). SACEX was incepted earlier than SPMGX: SACEX (9 years) vs SPMGX (6 years). SPMGX (3.36) is less costly to investors than SACEX (2.27). SPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. SACEX (13.00). SACEX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPMGX: SACEX (500) vs SPMGX (1000). SPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.43 vs. SACEX (9.00). SPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 417.02 vs. SACEX (234.37).
| SACEX | SPMGX | SACEX / SPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 3.36 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 3.36 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.324 | 8.486 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206M | 1.19B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 29.80 | 4.99 | 598% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.00 | 27.43 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.23 | 90.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 234.37 | 417.02 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |