It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SAFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SAFT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.21% price change this week, while STC (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.87%.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
STC is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
SAFT | STC | SAFT / STC | |
Capitalization | 1.22B | 1.77B | 69% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -7.499 | -2.878 | 261% |
P/E Ratio | 63.23 | 57.68 | 110% |
Revenue | 926M | 2.26B | 41% |
Total Cash | 518M | 272M | 190% |
Total Debt | 49.8M | 581M | 9% |
SAFT | STC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAFT's Valuation (22) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as STC (34) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to STC’s over the last 12 months.
STC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that STC’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's SMR Rating (76) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as STC (91) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to STC’s over the last 12 months.
STC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that STC’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
STC's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (97) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that STC’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT | STC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago49% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago46% | 3 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 4 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago53% | 6 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago42% | 3 days ago65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SAFT | 100% | -0.86% | ||
UFCS - SAFT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
CNA - SAFT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
L - SAFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
THG - SAFT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
CINF - SAFT | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STC has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
STC | 100% | -0.87% | ||
BNT - STC | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
L - STC | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
GLRE - STC | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
CINF - STC | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
CNA - STC | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More |