It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
SAM (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -3.89% price change this week, while TAP (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -2.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.23%.
SAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
TAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
SAM | TAP | SAM / TAP | |
Capitalization | 3.66B | 14.3B | 26% |
EBITDA | 210M | 2.17B | 10% |
Gain YTD | -12.390 | -0.022 | 56,091% |
P/E Ratio | 48.42 | 15.41 | 314% |
Revenue | 2.01B | 11.7B | 17% |
Total Cash | 298M | 869M | 34% |
Total Debt | 45.3M | 6.27B | 1% |
SAM | TAP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TAP's Valuation (32) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAM (87). This means that TAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAM’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAM (100). This means that TAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAM’s over the last 12 months.
SAM's SMR Rating (77) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (78). This means that SAM’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as SAM (53). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to SAM’s over the last 12 months.
SAM's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (99). This means that SAM’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.
SAM | TAP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago67% | 3 days ago52% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago61% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago69% | 3 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago73% | 5 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAM has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAM jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with STZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then STZ could also see price increases.