It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SAN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SAN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
SAN (@Major Banks) experienced а -5.60% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.
SAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
SAN | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAN | UIVM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 15 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 15 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 15 days ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 15 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 15 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago70% | 18 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 23 days ago73% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 15 days ago68% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SAN | 100% | -4.01% | ||
BBVA - SAN | 78% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
ING - SAN | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
BCS - SAN | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
SCBFY - SAN | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.81% | ||
EWBC - SAN | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.04% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UIVM has been loosely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UIVM jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UIVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
UIVM | 100% | N/A | ||
SAN - UIVM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
MT - UIVM | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
BBVA - UIVM | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
NWG - UIVM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
RIO - UIVM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More |