SAPIF
Price
$23.83
Change
-$0.23 (-0.96%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
9.79B
SWSSF
Price
$2.99
Change
+$0.99 (+49.50%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
29.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAPIF vs SWSSF

Header iconSAPIF vs SWSSF Comparison
Open Charts SAPIF vs SWSSFBanner chart's image
Saputo
Price$23.83
Change-$0.23 (-0.96%)
Volume$61.84K
Capitalization9.79B
Swiss Wtr Decaffinated Coffee
Price$2.99
Change+$0.99 (+49.50%)
Volume$4.5K
Capitalization29.08M
SAPIF vs SWSSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAPIF vs. SWSSF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAPIF is a Buy and SWSSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (SAPIF: $23.83 vs. SWSSF: $2.99)
Brand notoriety: SAPIF and SWSSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAPIF: 33% vs. SWSSF: 247%
Market capitalization -- SAPIF: $9.79B vs. SWSSF: $29.08M
SAPIF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $9.79B. SWSSF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $29.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAPIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWSSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SAPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAPIF is a better buy in the long-term than SWSSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAPIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWSSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAPIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWSSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWSSF is a better buy in the short-term than SAPIF.

Price Growth

SAPIF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +2.41% price change this week, while SWSSF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +49.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1016.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+0.96% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAPIF($9.79B) has a higher market cap than SWSSF($29.1M). SAPIF has higher P/E ratio than SWSSF: SAPIF (42.57) vs SWSSF (9.83). SAPIF YTD gains are higher at: 37.270 vs. SWSSF (19.600). SAPIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 730M vs. SWSSF (19.1M). SAPIF has more cash in the bank: 257M vs. SWSSF (4.99M). SWSSF has less debt than SAPIF: SWSSF (125M) vs SAPIF (3.59B). SAPIF has higher revenues than SWSSF: SAPIF (19.1B) vs SWSSF (197M).
SAPIFSWSSFSAPIF / SWSSF
Capitalization9.79B29.1M33,632%
EBITDA730M19.1M3,822%
Gain YTD37.27019.600190%
P/E Ratio42.579.83433%
Revenue19.1B197M9,695%
Total Cash257M4.99M5,155%
Total Debt3.59B125M2,875%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAPIF vs SWSSF: Fundamental Ratings
SAPIF
SWSSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3044
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
9083
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAPIF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWSSF (75). This means that SAPIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

SWSSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (100). This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

SWSSF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (90). This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

SWSSF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (40). This means that SWSSF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

SAPIF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SWSSF (100). This means that SAPIF’s stock grew significantly faster than SWSSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAPIFSWSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VWID33.610.39
+1.17%
Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF
FFGX29.180.10
+0.33%
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
GQRE59.940.14
+0.24%
FlexShares Glbl Quality Real Estate ETF
FTRI14.560.02
+0.14%
First Trust Indxx Glbl Natrl Res Inc ETF
GUSA55.95N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US 1000 Eq ETF

SAPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPIF and DAR have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPIF and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPIF
1D Price
Change %
SAPIF100%
N/A
DAR - SAPIF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
FLO - SAPIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.37%
NOMD - SAPIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
CENTA - SAPIF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
ASBFY - SAPIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

SWSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SWSSF and DTEAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SWSSF and DTEAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWSSF
1D Price
Change %
SWSSF100%
N/A
DTEAF - SWSSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
PRRFY - SWSSF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYF - SWSSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TATYY - SWSSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
SAPIF - SWSSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More