SAPIF
Price
$24.77
Change
+$0.18 (+0.73%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
10.25B
WLMIF
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.29B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAPIF vs WLMIF

Header iconSAPIF vs WLMIF Comparison
Open Charts SAPIF vs WLMIFBanner chart's image
Saputo
Price$24.77
Change+$0.18 (+0.73%)
Volume$42.91K
Capitalization10.25B
Wilmar International
Price$2.35
Change-$0.01 (-0.42%)
Volume$2.03K
Capitalization14.29B
SAPIF vs WLMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAPIF vs. WLMIF commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAPIF is a Hold and WLMIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (SAPIF: $24.77 vs. WLMIF: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: SAPIF and WLMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAPIF: 33% vs. WLMIF: 124%
Market capitalization -- SAPIF: $10.25B vs. WLMIF: $14.29B
SAPIF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $10.25B. WLMIF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $14.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $242.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAPIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SAPIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAPIF is a better buy in the long-term than WLMIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAPIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLMIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAPIF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WLMIF is a better buy in the short-term than SAPIF.

Price Growth

SAPIF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while WLMIF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -0.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.52% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($14.3B) has a higher market cap than SAPIF($10.2B). SAPIF has higher P/E ratio than WLMIF: SAPIF (42.57) vs WLMIF (12.43). SAPIF YTD gains are higher at: 42.713 vs. WLMIF (6.818). WLMIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.45B vs. SAPIF (767M). WLMIF has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. SAPIF (256M). SAPIF has less debt than WLMIF: SAPIF (3.52B) vs WLMIF (29.1B). WLMIF has higher revenues than SAPIF: WLMIF (69.3B) vs SAPIF (19.1B).
SAPIFWLMIFSAPIF / WLMIF
Capitalization10.2B14.3B71%
EBITDA767M4.45B17%
Gain YTD42.7136.818626%
P/E Ratio42.5712.43342%
Revenue19.1B69.3B28%
Total Cash256M12.9B2%
Total Debt3.52B29.1B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAPIF vs WLMIF: Fundamental Ratings
SAPIF
WLMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2928
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9299
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2719
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLMIF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (38). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (100). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

SAPIF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (99). This means that SAPIF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

SAPIF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as WLMIF (57). This means that SAPIF’s stock grew similarly to WLMIF’s over the last 12 months.

WLMIF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPIF (27). This means that WLMIF’s stock grew similarly to SAPIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAPIFWLMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
52%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAPIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAYD36.590.18
+0.49%
Rayliant Quantitative Dev Mkt Eq ETF
SJCP25.330.10
+0.42%
SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF
EIC13.910.04
+0.29%
Eagle Point Income Company
HACK83.370.22
+0.26%
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
SHRT7.66-0.05
-0.68%
Gotham Short Strategies ETF

SAPIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPIF and DAR have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPIF and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPIF
1D Price
Change %
SAPIF100%
+0.75%
DAR - SAPIF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
FLO - SAPIF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
NOMD - SAPIF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
CENTA - SAPIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
ASBFY - SAPIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
More

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
N/A
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASBFY - WLMIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
SAPIF - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
WLMIY - WLMIF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
ATPC - WLMIF
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
More