SAPMY
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.02 (-3.51%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.26B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBOEF
Price
$30.56
Change
-$1.59 (-4.95%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
508.83M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAPMY vs SBOEF

Header iconSAPMY vs SBOEF Comparison
Open Charts SAPMY vs SBOEFBanner chart's image
Saipem S.p.A
Price$0.55
Change-$0.02 (-3.51%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.26B
SBO AG
Price$30.56
Change-$1.59 (-4.95%)
Volume$901
Capitalization508.83M
SAPMY vs SBOEF Comparison Chart in %
SAPMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBOEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAPMY vs. SBOEF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAPMY is a Hold and SBOEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (SAPMY: $0.55 vs. SBOEF: $30.56)
Brand notoriety: SAPMY and SBOEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAPMY: 2% vs. SBOEF: 106%
Market capitalization -- SAPMY: $5.11B vs. SBOEF: $512.32M
SAPMY [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $5.11B. SBOEF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $512.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAPMY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBOEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SAPMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBOEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAPMY is a better buy in the long-term than SBOEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAPMY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBOEF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAPMY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBOEF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAPMY is a better buy in the short-term than SBOEF.

Price Growth

SAPMY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while SBOEF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-1.58% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAPMY($5.26B) has a higher market cap than SBOEF($509M). SAPMY has higher P/E ratio than SBOEF: SAPMY (14.80) vs SBOEF (10.61). SAPMY YTD gains are higher at: 25.792 vs. SBOEF (-38.387). SAPMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.5B vs. SBOEF (102M). SAPMY has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. SBOEF (279M). SBOEF has less debt than SAPMY: SBOEF (373M) vs SAPMY (2.87B). SAPMY has higher revenues than SBOEF: SAPMY (15.3B) vs SBOEF (526M).
SAPMYSBOEFSAPMY / SBOEF
Capitalization5.26B509M1,033%
EBITDA1.5B102M1,475%
Gain YTD25.792-38.387-67%
P/E Ratio14.8010.61139%
Revenue15.3B526M2,909%
Total Cash2.28B279M819%
Total Debt2.87B373M770%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAPMY vs SBOEF: Fundamental Ratings
SAPMY
SBOEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8344
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
7772
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4375
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5345
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
41n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBOEF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPMY (12). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to SAPMY’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPMY (100). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to SAPMY’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPMY (77). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to SAPMY’s over the last 12 months.

SAPMY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SBOEF (75). This means that SAPMY’s stock grew similarly to SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPMY (53). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to SAPMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAPMYSBOEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAPMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBOEF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLTAX16.91N/A
N/A
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation A
TEOOX10.52N/A
N/A
Transamerica Emerging Markets Eq R6
AMOMX24.15-0.18
-0.74%
AQR Large Cap Momentum Style I
HFQTX6.95-0.06
-0.86%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income T
MUIFX33.78-0.34
-1.00%
Nationwide Institutional Service

SAPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPMY and SUBCY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPMY and SUBCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPMY
1D Price
Change %
SAPMY100%
-4.16%
SUBCY - SAPMY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
FTI - SAPMY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
SNVVF - SAPMY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBOEY - SAPMY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYTF - SAPMY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More

SBOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBOEF and SAPMY have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBOEF and SAPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBOEF
1D Price
Change %
SBOEF100%
N/A
SAPMY - SBOEF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
PSYTF - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
QSEP - SBOEF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.05%
TAGP - SBOEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-21.05%
SNVVF - SBOEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More