SAPMY
Price
$0.50
Change
+$0.04 (+8.70%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
TAGP
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
104.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAPMY vs TAGP

Header iconSAPMY vs TAGP Comparison
Open Charts SAPMY vs TAGPBanner chart's image
Saipem S.p.A
Price$0.50
Change+$0.04 (+8.70%)
Volume$2.04K
Capitalization1.18B
Tristar Acquisition Group
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization104.71M
SAPMY vs TAGP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SAPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAPMY vs. TAGP commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAPMY is a Hold and TAGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (SAPMY: $0.50 vs. TAGP: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: SAPMY and TAGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAPMY: 11% vs. TAGP: 11%
Market capitalization -- SAPMY: $1.18B vs. TAGP: $104.71M
SAPMY [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.18B. TAGP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $104.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAPMY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAGP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SAPMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAPMY is a better buy in the long-term than TAGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAPMY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAPMY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TAGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAGP is a better buy in the short-term than SAPMY.

Price Growth

SAPMY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -3.16% price change this week, while TAGP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -14.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-1.95% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAPMY($1.18B) has a higher market cap than TAGP($105M). TAGP YTD gains are higher at: 45.909 vs. SAPMY (14.356). TAGP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -58.87K vs. SAPMY (-254M). SAPMY has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. TAGP (7.39M). TAGP has less debt than SAPMY: TAGP (40.3M) vs SAPMY (3.74B). SAPMY has higher revenues than TAGP: SAPMY (6.87B) vs TAGP (0).
SAPMYTAGPSAPMY / TAGP
Capitalization1.18B105M1,127%
EBITDA-254M-58.87K431,437%
Gain YTD14.35645.90931%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue6.87B0-
Total Cash1.5B7.39M20,241%
Total Debt3.74B40.3M9,270%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAPMY vs TAGP: Fundamental Ratings
SAPMY
TAGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7898
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10097
SMR RATING
1..100
80100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3938

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAGP's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPMY (20). This means that TAGP’s stock grew similarly to SAPMY’s over the last 12 months.

TAGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SAPMY (100). This means that TAGP’s stock grew similarly to SAPMY’s over the last 12 months.

SAPMY's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (100). This means that SAPMY’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

SAPMY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (64). This means that SAPMY’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

SAPMY's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAGP (100). This means that SAPMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAPMYTAGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAPMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCFN49.00N/A
N/A
Muncy Columbia Financial Corporation
RFNDF1.17N/A
N/A
Rural Funds Group Stapled Securities
YORKF0.06N/A
N/A
York Harbour Metals, Inc.
ABLZF65.00-0.39
-0.60%
ABB Ltd.
ISMAY20.63-0.87
-4.05%
Indra Sistemas SA

SAPMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SAPMY and SUBCY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAPMY and SUBCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAPMY
1D Price
Change %
SAPMY100%
+8.96%
SUBCY - SAPMY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
FTI - SAPMY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
SNVVF - SAPMY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBOEY - SAPMY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYTF - SAPMY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TAGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAGP and MRC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAGP and MRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAGP
1D Price
Change %
TAGP100%
N/A
MRC - TAGP
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.71%
QSEP - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
SAPMY - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
+8.96%
WYGPY - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
TOLWF - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
More