Ad is loading...
SB
Price
$4.27
Change
-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
91 days until earnings call
SFL
Price
$10.39
Change
-$0.14 (-1.33%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
87 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SB vs SFL

Header iconSB vs SFL Comparison
Open Charts SB vs SFLBanner chart's image
Safe Bulkers
Price$4.27
Change-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Volume$423.69K
CapitalizationN/A
SFL
Price$10.39
Change-$0.14 (-1.33%)
Volume$868.3K
CapitalizationN/A
SB vs SFL Comparison Chart
Loading...
SB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SB vs. SFL commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SB is a Sell and SFL is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SB: $4.27 vs. SFL: $10.39)
Brand notoriety: SB and SFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SB: 83% vs. SFL: 109%
Market capitalization -- SB: $455.91M vs. SFL: $1.39B
SB [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $455.91M. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SB is a better buy in the long-term than SFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SB is a better buy in the short-term than SFL.

Price Growth

SB (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -1.61% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

SB is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

SFL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.01% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFL($1.39B) has a higher market cap than SB($456M). SFL has higher P/E ratio than SB: SFL (10.39) vs SB (5.41). SB YTD gains are higher at: 11.987 vs. SFL (-1.836). SFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 529M vs. SB (125M). SB has less debt than SFL: SB (491M) vs SFL (2.67B). SFL has higher revenues than SB: SFL (822M) vs SB (307M).
SBSFLSB / SFL
Capitalization456M1.39B33%
EBITDA125M529M24%
Gain YTD11.987-1.836-653%
P/E Ratio5.4110.3952%
Revenue307M822M37%
Total Cash72.3MN/A-
Total Debt491M2.67B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SB vs SFL: Fundamental Ratings
SB
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1768
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3179
SMR RATING
1..100
6361
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6579
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFL's Valuation (9) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SB (20). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to SB’s over the last 12 months.

SB's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFL (79). This means that SB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's SMR Rating (61) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SB (63). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to SB’s over the last 12 months.

SB's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (62). This means that SB’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SB's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (79). This means that SB’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLUIX30.58-0.06
-0.20%
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val I
WQAUX12.35-0.07
-0.56%
Westwood Quality AllCap Ultra
VSFAX27.79-0.28
-1.00%
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value A
LGLSX45.96-0.79
-1.69%
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
DREQX21.25-0.50
-2.30%
BNY Mellon Research Growth Z

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
-1.33%
ASC - SFL
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
SB - SFL
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
NMM - SFL
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
CMRE - SFL
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
DAC - SFL
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More