ASC
Price
$17.68
Change
-$0.15 (-0.84%)
Updated
Sep 25, 11:55 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
719.4M
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFL
Price
$12.91
Change
-$0.07 (-0.54%)
Updated
Sep 25, 12:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.8B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASC vs SFL

ASC vs SFL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASC vs. SFL commentary
Sep 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASC is a StrongBuy and SFL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASC vs SFL: Fundamental Ratings
ASC
SFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9091
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3931
SMR RATING
1..100
5487
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
885
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASC's Valuation (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as SFL (10). This means that ASC’s stock grew similarly to SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ASC (39). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

ASC's SMR Rating (54) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFL (87). This means that ASC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFL’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as ASC (40). This means that SFL’s stock grew similarly to ASC’s over the last 12 months.

SFL's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASC (88). This means that SFL’s stock grew significantly faster than ASC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASCSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2026
Stock price -- (ASC: $17.83 vs. SFL: $12.98)
Brand notoriety: ASC and SFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASC: 109% vs. SFL: 164%
Market capitalization -- ASC: $728.39M vs. SFL: $1.8B
ASC [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $728.39M. SFL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $2K to $50.64B. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $1.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SFL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ASC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFL is a better buy in the long-term than ASC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFL is a better buy in the short-term than ASC.

Price Growth

ASC (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -6.16% price change this week, while SFL (@Marine Shipping) price change was -5.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -6.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

SFL is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-6.25% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

View a ticker or compare two or three
ASC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTF11.330.03
+0.27%
DTF Tax-Free Income 2028 Term Fund
SIOO19.880.01
+0.07%
VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO)
SAY25.14-0.02
-0.06%
Saratoga Investment Corp
GFLW33.55-0.10
-0.28%
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW)
PKB91.27-0.41
-0.45%
Invesco Building & Construction ETF (PKB)

ASC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASC has been closely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASC jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASC
1D Price
Change %
ASC100%
+1.25%
HAFN - ASC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
ECO - ASC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
NAT - ASC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
SFL - ASC
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
NMM - ASC
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
More

SFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFL has been loosely correlated with ASC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFL jumps, then ASC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFL
1D Price
Change %
SFL100%
+2.04%
ASC - SFL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
HAFN - SFL
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
ECO - SFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
CMRE - SFL
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
GSL - SFL
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
More