SBCF
Price
$32.08
Change
+$0.76 (+2.43%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
3.12B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WAFDP
Price
$16.25
Change
+$0.03 (+0.18%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBCF vs WAFDP

Header iconSBCF vs WAFDP Comparison
Open Charts SBCF vs WAFDPBanner chart's image
SBCF vs WAFDP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBCF vs. WAFDP commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBCF is a StrongBuy and WAFDP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (SBCF: $32.08 vs. WAFDP: $16.25)
Brand notoriety: SBCF and WAFDP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBCF: 90% vs. WAFDP: 86%
Market capitalization -- SBCF: $3.12B vs. WAFDP: $0
SBCF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.12B. WAFDP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAFDP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAFDP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the long-term than WAFDP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAFDP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • WAFDP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WAFDP is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

SBCF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.37% price change this week, while WAFDP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF YTD gains are higher at: 2.748 vs. WAFDP (-1.240). SBCF has less debt than WAFDP: SBCF (888M) vs WAFDP (3.12B). WAFDP has higher revenues than SBCF: WAFDP (763M) vs SBCF (676M).
SBCFWAFDPSBCF / WAFDP
Capitalization3.12BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.748-1.240-222%
P/E Ratio21.53N/A-
Revenue676M763M89%
Total Cash174MN/A-
Total Debt888M3.12B29%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBCFWAFDP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WAFDP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIS76.820.58
+0.76%
VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF
GBAB14.170.03
+0.21%
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal
DBEZ61.700.11
+0.18%
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Eq ETF
SHEH62.42-0.18
-0.29%
SHELL PLC ADRHEDGED
CQQQ51.30-0.66
-1.27%
Invesco China Technology ETF

WAFDP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAFDP has been loosely correlated with FULTP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WAFDP jumps, then FULTP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAFDP
1D Price
Change %
WAFDP100%
+0.18%
FULTP - WAFDP
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
PLBC - WAFDP
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
HBANL - WAFDP
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
OZKAP - WAFDP
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
MBINN - WAFDP
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
More