SBDS
Price
$14.40
Change
+$0.40 (+2.86%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
23.72M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
W
Price
$83.09
Change
-$0.03 (-0.04%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.77B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBDS vs W

Header iconSBDS vs W Comparison
Open Charts SBDS vs WBanner chart's image
Solo Brands
Price$14.40
Change+$0.40 (+2.86%)
Volume$23K
Capitalization23.72M
Wayfair
Price$83.09
Change-$0.03 (-0.04%)
Volume$3.05M
Capitalization10.77B
SBDS vs W Comparison Chart in %
SBDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBDS vs. W commentary
Oct 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBDS is a Hold and W is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 25, 2025
Stock price -- (SBDS: $14.40 vs. W: $83.09)
Brand notoriety: SBDS: Not notable vs. W: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBDS: 164% vs. W: 84%
Market capitalization -- SBDS: $23.72M vs. W: $10.77B
SBDS [@Internet Retail] is valued at $23.72M. W’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $10.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.39T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $51.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SBDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • W’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SBDS and W are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBDS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while W’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • W’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, W is a better buy in the short-term than SBDS.

Price Growth

SBDS (@Internet Retail) experienced а -6.49% price change this week, while W (@Internet Retail) price change was +0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +654.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

W is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+1.74% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
W($10.8B) has a higher market cap than SBDS($23.7M). SBDS YTD gains are higher at: 1163.158 vs. W (87.477). W has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. SBDS (-166.65M). W has more cash in the bank: 1.38B vs. SBDS (18.1M). SBDS has less debt than W: SBDS (265M) vs W (3.75B). W has higher revenues than SBDS: W (12B) vs SBDS (407M).
SBDSWSBDS / W
Capitalization23.7M10.8B0%
EBITDA-166.65M124M-134%
Gain YTD1163.15887.4771,330%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue407M12B3%
Total Cash18.1M1.38B1%
Total Debt265M3.75B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
W: Fundamental Ratings
W
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBDSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHPY58.260.73
+1.27%
YieldMax Semiconductor Port Opt Inc ETF
WBIY31.100.17
+0.56%
WBI Power Factor® High Dividend ETF
FDEC49.730.18
+0.36%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Dec
FPAG36.420.09
+0.23%
FPA Global Equity ETF
LDRT25.40N/A
+0.02%
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF

SBDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBDS has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBDS jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBDS
1D Price
Change %
SBDS100%
+2.86%
CVNA - SBDS
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
W - SBDS
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
AMZN - SBDS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
RVLV - SBDS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
MOGU - SBDS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More