SBFFF
Price
$27.20
Change
+$1.33 (+5.14%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
4.42B
48 days until earnings call
TAGP
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
12.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBFFF vs TAGP

Header iconSBFFF vs TAGP Comparison
Open Charts SBFFF vs TAGPBanner chart's image
SBM Offshore
Price$27.20
Change+$1.33 (+5.14%)
Volume$520
Capitalization4.42B
Tristar Acquisition Group
Price$0.07
Change+$0.02 (+40.00%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization12.67M
SBFFF vs TAGP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBFFF vs. TAGP commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBFFF is a Hold and TAGP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (SBFFF: $27.20 vs. TAGP: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: SBFFF and TAGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBFFF: 107% vs. TAGP: 40%
Market capitalization -- SBFFF: $4.42B vs. TAGP: $12.67M
SBFFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $4.42B. TAGP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $12.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $51.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBFFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTAGP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SBFFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TAGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBFFF is a better buy in the long-term than TAGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBFFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBFFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TAGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAGP is a better buy in the short-term than SBFFF.

Price Growth

SBFFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TAGP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBFFF is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.16% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBFFF($4.42B) has a higher market cap than TAGP($12.7M). TAGP YTD gains are higher at: 204.545 vs. SBFFF (60.947). SBFFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.43B vs. TAGP (-58.87K). SBFFF has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. TAGP (0). TAGP has less debt than SBFFF: TAGP (40.3M) vs SBFFF (9.16B). SBFFF has higher revenues than TAGP: SBFFF (5.4B) vs TAGP (0).
SBFFFTAGPSBFFF / TAGP
Capitalization4.42B12.7M34,819%
EBITDA1.43B-58.87K-2,425,560%
Gain YTD60.947204.54530%
P/E Ratio13.47N/A-
Revenue5.4B0-
Total Cash1.01B0-
Total Debt9.16B40.3M22,732%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBFFF vs TAGP: Fundamental Ratings
SBFFF
TAGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4841
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3496
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBFFF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (32). This means that SBFFF’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

SBFFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAGP (96). This means that SBFFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

SBFFF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (100). This means that SBFFF’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TAGP's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SBFFF (47). This means that TAGP’s stock grew similarly to SBFFF’s over the last 12 months.

SBFFF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAGP (100). This means that SBFFF’s stock grew significantly faster than TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBFFFTAGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCPCX50.85N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS IC
GTCCX28.60N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Content & Connect C
MLVPX20.12N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Equity R3
FLMIX10.34N/A
N/A
Meeder Muirfield Institutional
CIRAX78.28-0.45
-0.57%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529A

SBFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBFFF and HGHAF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBFFF and HGHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBFFF
1D Price
Change %
SBFFF100%
N/A
HGHAF - SBFFF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBFFY - SBFFF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBOEY - SBFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
TAGP - SBFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNVVF - SBFFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.21%
More

TAGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAGP and MRC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAGP and MRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAGP
1D Price
Change %
TAGP100%
N/A
MRC - TAGP
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
QSEP - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.05%
SAPMY - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
+16.89%
WYGPY - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOLWF - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
More