SBGOF
Price
$14.14
Change
+$2.11 (+17.54%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
17.82B
SNLC
Price
$168.00
Change
+$7.00 (+4.35%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBGOF vs SNLC

Header iconSBGOF vs SNLC Comparison
Open Charts SBGOF vs SNLCBanner chart's image
Standard Bank Group
Price$14.14
Change+$2.11 (+17.54%)
Volume$177
Capitalization17.82B
Security National
Price$168.00
Change+$7.00 (+4.35%)
Volume$530
CapitalizationN/A
SBGOF vs SNLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBGOF vs. SNLC commentary
Aug 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBGOF is a Hold and SNLC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 04, 2025
Stock price -- (SBGOF: $14.14 vs. SNLC: $168.00)
Brand notoriety: SBGOF and SNLC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBGOF: 17% vs. SNLC: 250%
Market capitalization -- SBGOF: $17.82B vs. SNLC: $0
SBGOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $17.82B. SNLC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBGOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNLC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SBGOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBGOF is a better buy in the long-term than SNLC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBGOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNLC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBGOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SNLC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNLC is a better buy in the short-term than SBGOF.

Price Growth

SBGOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.26% price change this week, while SNLC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBGOF YTD gains are higher at: 27.755 vs. SNLC (23.132).
SBGOFSNLCSBGOF / SNLC
Capitalization17.8BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.75523.132120%
P/E Ratio7.87N/A-
Revenue138BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt31.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBGOF vs SNLC: Fundamental Ratings
SBGOF
SNLC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34100
SMR RATING
1..100
1100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNLC's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBGOF (81). This means that SNLC’s stock grew significantly faster than SBGOF’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNLC (100). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNLC’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNLC (100). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNLC’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SNLC (46). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew similarly to SNLC’s over the last 12 months.

SBGOF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNLC (100). This means that SBGOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNLC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBGOFSNLC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NORW28.48-0.02
-0.08%
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
SFLR33.96-0.42
-1.22%
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
XLK257.07-5.67
-2.16%
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
FTXO32.87-0.79
-2.36%
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF
XXCH26.11-0.69
-2.58%
Direxion Daily MSCI Em Mkt Ex Chn Bl 2X

SBGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBGOF has been loosely correlated with MTPOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBGOF jumps, then MTPOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBGOF
1D Price
Change %
SBGOF100%
N/A
MTPOF - SBGOF
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
CIHHF - SBGOF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNBO - SBGOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLC - SBGOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A

SNLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNLC and AVAL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNLC and AVAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNLC
1D Price
Change %
SNLC100%
N/A
AVAL - SNLC
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
SBGOF - SNLC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INFT - SNLC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFBN - SNLC
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRMY - SNLC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More