Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SBHCX vs WCMLX
SBHCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts SBHCX vs WCMLX
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Cre Ret
Price$12.60
Change-$0.10 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.44M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.61
Change-$0.11 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.78M
SBHCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SBHCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBHCX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBHCX has more cash in the bank: 96.4M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). SBHCX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: SBHCX (0.20) vs WCMLX (0.00). SBHCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: SBHCX (6 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). SBHCX (2.46) is less costly to investors than WCMLX (1.79). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. SBHCX (40.00). SBHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: SBHCX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. SBHCX (-2.33). SBHCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.81 vs. WCMLX (24.05).
| SBHCX | WCMLX | SBHCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.79 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.276 | 6.687 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.4M | 44.8M | 215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.33 | 4.73 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.33 | 41.59 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.81 | 24.05 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers