SBMSF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.05 (-31.25%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
VRDR
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

SBMSF vs VRDR

Header iconSBMSF vs VRDR Comparison
Open Charts SBMSF vs VRDRBanner chart's image
Danakali
Price$0.11
Change-$0.05 (-31.25%)
Volume$66.09K
CapitalizationN/A
Verde Resources
Price$0.16
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$24.1K
CapitalizationN/A
SBMSF vs VRDR Comparison Chart
Loading...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBMSF vs. VRDR commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBMSF is a Hold and VRDR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (SBMSF: $0.11 vs. VRDR: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: SBMSF and VRDR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBMSF: 244% vs. VRDR: 146%
Market capitalization -- SBMSF: $88.4M vs. VRDR: $411.67M
SBMSF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $88.4M. VRDR’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $411.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBMSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRDR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SBMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBMSF is a better buy in the long-term than VRDR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBMSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRDR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBMSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VRDR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRDR is a better buy in the short-term than SBMSF.

Price Growth

SBMSF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -26.52% price change this week, while VRDR (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +7.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (-2.56% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRDR($412M) has a higher market cap than SBMSF($88.4M). VRDR YTD gains are higher at: -15.789 vs. SBMSF (-57.815). VRDR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.57M vs. SBMSF (-4.81M). SBMSF has more cash in the bank: 22.9M vs. VRDR (241K). VRDR has higher revenues than SBMSF: VRDR (155K) vs SBMSF (18.2K).
SBMSFVRDRSBMSF / VRDR
Capitalization88.4M412M21%
EBITDA-4.81M-2.57M187%
Gain YTD-57.815-15.789366%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue18.2K155K12%
Total Cash22.9M241K9,502%
Total DebtN/A1.46M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBMSF vs VRDR: Fundamental Ratings
SBMSF
VRDR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
8891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a40

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBMSF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRDR (99). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRDR’s over the last 12 months.

VRDR's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBMSF (100). This means that VRDR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as VRDR (91). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to VRDR’s over the last 12 months.

VRDR's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as SBMSF (93). This means that VRDR’s stock grew similarly to SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRDR (100). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRDR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBMSFVRDR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRDR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENZ0.760.05
+7.05%
Enzo Biochem
FARO26.070.44
+1.72%
FARO Technologies
TD52.250.69
+1.34%
Toronto Dominion Bank
GDYN20.500.09
+0.44%
Grid Dynamics Holdings
CHX25.79-0.14
-0.54%
ChampionX Corp

SBMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBMSF and CBLUF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBMSF and CBLUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBMSF
1D Price
Change %
SBMSF100%
-26.52%
CBLUF - SBMSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YRAIF - SBMSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRDR - SBMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
YARIY - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
NUFMF - SBMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VRDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRDR and SNFRF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRDR and SNFRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRDR
1D Price
Change %
VRDR100%
+6.67%
SNFRF - VRDR
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUFMF - VRDR
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VVIVF - VRDR
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
MGROF - VRDR
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.31%
SBMSF - VRDR
2%
Poorly correlated
-26.52%
More