SBNY
Price
$0.68
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.15M
9 days until earnings call
SUPV
Price
$9.86
Change
-$0.55 (-5.28%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
678.03M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBNY vs SUPV

Header iconSBNY vs SUPV Comparison
Open Charts SBNY vs SUPVBanner chart's image
Signature Bank (New York, NY)
Price$0.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.06K
Capitalization3.15M
Grupo Supervielle SA
Price$9.86
Change-$0.55 (-5.28%)
Volume$1.06M
Capitalization678.03M
SBNY vs SUPV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUPV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBNY vs. SUPV commentary
Jul 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBNY is a Hold and SUPV is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 13, 2025
Stock price -- (SBNY: $0.68 vs. SUPV: $9.86)
Brand notoriety: SBNY and SUPV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBNY: 33% vs. SUPV: 95%
Market capitalization -- SBNY: $3.15M vs. SUPV: $678.03M
SBNY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.15M. SUPV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $678.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBNY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSUPV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SBNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SUPV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUPV is a better buy in the long-term than SBNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUPV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SUPV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SUPV is a better buy in the short-term than SBNY.

Price Growth

SBNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.21% price change this week, while SUPV (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBNY is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

SUPV is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.07% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUPV($678M) has a higher market cap than SBNY($3.15M). SUPV has higher P/E ratio than SBNY: SUPV (20.40) vs SBNY (0.00). SUPV YTD gains are higher at: -33.891 vs. SBNY (-50.365). SUPV has less debt than SBNY: SUPV (22.6M) vs SBNY (2.31B). SUPV has higher revenues than SBNY: SUPV (146B) vs SBNY (2.7B).
SBNYSUPVSBNY / SUPV
Capitalization3.15M678M0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-50.365-33.891149%
P/E Ratio0.0020.400%
Revenue2.7B146B2%
Total Cash11.3BN/A-
Total Debt2.31B22.6M10,230%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBNY vs SUPV: Fundamental Ratings
SBNY
SUPV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
766
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
81
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
972
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBNY's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUPV (77) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew significantly faster than SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

SUPV's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBNY (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SUPV’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

SUPV's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SBNY (8) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SUPV’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (64) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

SUPV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBNY (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SUPV’s stock grew significantly faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBNYSUPV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUPV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRVI6.550.14
+2.18%
Trevi Therapeutics
CARM0.40N/A
+0.50%
Carisma Therapeutics
NTR60.990.19
+0.31%
Nutrien Ltd
SACH1.29N/A
N/A
Sachem Capital Corp
BUR14.18-0.41
-2.81%
Burford Capital Limited

SUPV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUPV has been closely correlated with BMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUPV jumps, then BMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUPV
1D Price
Change %
SUPV100%
-5.28%
BMA - SUPV
91%
Closely correlated
-3.38%
BBAR - SUPV
91%
Closely correlated
-5.66%
GGAL - SUPV
91%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
BSAC - SUPV
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
BAP - SUPV
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
More