BMA
Price
$94.00
Change
-$3.28 (-3.37%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.39B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SUPV
Price
$10.10
Change
-$0.22 (-2.13%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
995.42M
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMA vs SUPV

BMA vs SUPV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) vs. Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) and Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) are both Argentine regional banks offering retail, corporate, and financial services, with exposure to the same macroeconomic environment in Argentina.
  • In recent market activity, BMA has maintained a larger market capitalization and announced dividend distributions, while SUPV has exhibited higher price volatility amid earnings reports.
  • Both stocks have faced downward pressure in broader timeframes, reflecting sector challenges such as currency fluctuations and interest rate dynamics in Argentina.
  • BMA demonstrates relatively greater scale in assets and branch network compared to the smaller SUPV, influencing liquidity and investor positioning.
  • Market sentiment for both remains tied to Argentine economic indicators, with limited differentiation in recent weeks beyond company-specific capital returns and operational updates.
  • Relative performance highlights trade-offs in size versus potential agility, with neither showing consistent outperformance in the latest period.

Introduction

This comparison examines BMA and SUPV, two publicly traded Argentine banks listed on the NYSE as American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). Both operate primarily in retail and corporate banking within Argentina, making them relevant for investors seeking exposure to emerging-market financial services. Traders and portfolio managers focused on sector peers, macroeconomic influences from Latin America, or relative value opportunities may find this analysis useful for assessing positioning within a volatile regional banking landscape.

BMA Overview and Recent Performance

Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) provides a range of banking products including deposits, loans, credit cards, and foreign trade services to retail and corporate clients across Argentina. The company operates a network of branches and emphasizes services tailored to regional economies. In recent weeks, BMA stock has traded in a range influenced by broader market sentiment toward Argentine financials, with price movements reflecting ongoing economic adjustments. Key developments include announcements regarding dividend distributions, which have supported investor attention amid capital return initiatives. Overall sentiment has been shaped by the bank’s scale and liquidity profile, contributing to relatively stable positioning compared to smaller peers during periods of market fluctuation.

SUPV Overview and Recent Performance

Grupo Supervielle S.A. (SUPV) functions as a financial services holding company offering personal and business banking, corporate lending, insurance, and asset management services primarily in Argentina. Its operations include loans, deposits, and digital banking solutions through a network of branches and ATMs. In recent market activity, SUPV has displayed notable price swings tied to earnings releases and sector-wide pressures. Performance has been affected by mixed results in quarterly reports and sensitivity to local economic conditions. Sentiment reflects the company’s smaller scale, which can amplify both upside potential and downside risks during shifts in investor appetite for Argentine equities.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots designed for various market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest performers suited to prevailing environments are featured in this trending section. The platform highlights 25 best AI trending bots selected from a total of 351 available options. These bots encompass diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore technical or fundamental approaches across asset classes and volatility levels. All AI trading bots operate with distinct risk parameters and objectives. For those interested in automated strategies, explore the Trending AI Robots page to review current selections.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In business models, BMA operates with greater scale as a standalone regional bank, while SUPV functions as a holding company with diversified segments including insurance and asset management, offering potentially broader revenue streams but added complexity. Growth drivers for both center on Argentina’s economic recovery, though BMA benefits from a larger deposit base and corporate client relationships. Recent momentum shows BMA with more consistent dividend-related catalysts, whereas SUPV has encountered sharper swings linked to earnings variability. Risk factors include shared exposure to currency and regulatory changes in Argentina, with SUPV carrying higher relative volatility due to its smaller market capitalization. Sector exposure remains aligned in regional banking, yet market sentiment has occasionally favored larger players like BMA for perceived stability during uncertain periods.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, capital return initiatives, and relative positioning within the Argentine banking sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term characteristics to BMA over SUPV. This assessment draws from BMA’s larger scale and recent dividend activity, which may support more stable sentiment compared to the higher volatility observed in SUPV. Outcomes remain subject to broader market and economic variables.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BMA vs. SUPV commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMA is a Hold and SUPV is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BMA: $97.28 vs. SUPV: $10.32)
Brand notoriety: BMA and SUPV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMA: 159% vs. SUPV: 169%
Market capitalization -- BMA: $6.39B vs. SUPV: $995.42M
BMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.39B. SUPV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $995.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSUPV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BMA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SUPV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMA is a better buy in the long-term than SUPV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BMA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUPV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SUPV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BMA and SUPV are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.67% price change this week, while SUPV (@Regional Banks) price change was -8.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

BMA is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.

SUPV is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMA($6.39B) has a higher market cap than SUPV($995M). SUPV has higher P/E ratio than BMA: SUPV (37.62) vs BMA (24.62). BMA YTD gains are higher at: 11.491 vs. SUPV (-12.690). SUPV has less debt than BMA: SUPV (119B) vs BMA (1.48T). BMA has higher revenues than SUPV: BMA (4.71T) vs SUPV (1.15T).
BMASUPVBMA / SUPV
Capitalization6.39B995M642%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.491-12.690-91%
P/E Ratio24.6237.6265%
Revenue4.71T1.15T411%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.48T119B1,245%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BMA vs SUPV: Fundamental Ratings
BMA
SUPV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4244
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4165
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BMA's Valuation (21) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUPV (79) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (65) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (1) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (39) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

BMA's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SUPV (7) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to SUPV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BMASUPV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SUPV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTG75.02-0.20
-0.26%
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
STRK.X0.033222-0.000140
-0.42%
Starknet cryptocurrency
DIA.X0.116060-0.001201
-1.02%
DIA cryptocurrency
WAVES.X0.289792-0.009013
-3.02%
Waves cryptocurrency
REEF.X0.000052-0.000004
-7.01%
Reef cryptocurrency

SUPV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUPV has been closely correlated with BBAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUPV jumps, then BBAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUPV
1D Price
Change %
SUPV100%
-9.31%
BBAR - SUPV
93%
Closely correlated
-4.16%
GGAL - SUPV
93%
Closely correlated
-5.35%
BMA - SUPV
93%
Closely correlated
-4.33%
BSAC - SUPV
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
CIB - SUPV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
More