SBNY
Price
$0.68
Change
+$0.03 (+4.62%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
72.42M
13 days until earnings call
WF
Price
$56.16
Change
-$0.18 (-0.32%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.68B
15 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBNY vs WF

Header iconSBNY vs WF Comparison
Open Charts SBNY vs WFBanner chart's image
Signature Bank (New York, NY)
Price$0.68
Change+$0.03 (+4.62%)
Volume$12.12K
Capitalization72.42M
Woori Financial Group
Price$56.16
Change-$0.18 (-0.32%)
Volume$300
Capitalization13.68B
SBNY vs WF Comparison Chart in %
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBNY vs. WF commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBNY is a Hold and WF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (SBNY: $0.68 vs. WF: $56.34)
Brand notoriety: SBNY and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBNY: 16% vs. WF: 111%
Market capitalization -- SBNY: $72.42M vs. WF: $13.68B
SBNY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $72.42M. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBNY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SBNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than SBNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBNY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the short-term than SBNY.

Price Growth

SBNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.62% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBNY is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.18% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WF($13.7B) has a higher market cap than SBNY($72.4M). WF has higher P/E ratio than SBNY: WF (7.16) vs SBNY (0.06). WF YTD gains are higher at: 83.840 vs. SBNY (-50.365). SBNY has less debt than WF: SBNY (12.1B) vs WF (80.55T). WF has higher revenues than SBNY: WF (12.85T) vs SBNY (2.7B).
SBNYWFSBNY / WF
Capitalization72.4M13.7B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-50.36583.840-60%
P/E Ratio0.067.161%
Revenue2.7B12.85T0%
Total Cash5.88BN/A-
Total Debt12.1B80.55T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBNY vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
SBNY
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7476
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10012
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9813
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBNY's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WF (65) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBNY (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SBNY (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SBNY (63) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBNY (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBNYWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLTY65.250.86
+1.34%
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
NPFI26.36-0.03
-0.10%
Nuveen Preferred and Income ETF
UDEC38.44-0.07
-0.18%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Dec
WDNA16.84-0.06
-0.36%
WisdomTree BioRevolution ETF
JEMA48.34-0.36
-0.74%
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders EM Eq ETF