Ad is loading...
SBNY
Price
$1.32
Change
+$0.04 (+3.12%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
One day until earnings call
WF
Price
$33.93
Change
-$0.06 (-0.18%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SBNY vs WF

Header iconSBNY vs WF Comparison
Open Charts SBNY vs WFBanner chart's image
Signature Bank (New York, NY)
Price$1.32
Change+$0.04 (+3.12%)
Volume$97.62K
CapitalizationN/A
Woori Financial Group
Price$33.93
Change-$0.06 (-0.18%)
Volume$39.69K
CapitalizationN/A
SBNY vs WF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBNY vs. WF commentary
Nov 17, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBNY is a Hold and WF is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 17, 2024
Stock price -- (SBNY: $1.32 vs. WF: $33.93)
Brand notoriety: SBNY and WF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBNY: 133% vs. WF: 57%
Market capitalization -- SBNY: $3.15M vs. WF: $7.73B
SBNY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.15M. WF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBNY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SBNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WF is a better buy in the long-term than SBNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBNY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBNY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SBNY and WF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SBNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.54% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBNY is expected to report earnings on Jan 14, 2025.

WF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WF($7.73B) has a higher market cap than SBNY($3.15M). WF has higher P/E ratio than SBNY: WF (3.62) vs SBNY (0.00). WF YTD gains are higher at: 18.605 vs. SBNY (-17.546). WF has higher revenues than SBNY: WF (11.84T) vs SBNY (2.7B).
SBNYWFSBNY / WF
Capitalization3.15M7.73B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.54618.605-94%
P/E Ratio0.003.620%
Revenue2.7B11.84T0%
Total Cash11.3BN/A-
Total Debt2.31BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBNY vs WF: Fundamental Ratings
SBNY
WF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5062
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
81
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9628
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBNY's Valuation (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (4) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBNY (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SBNY (8) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

SBNY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WF (56) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SBNY’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.

WF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBNY (96) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WF’s stock grew significantly faster than SBNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBNYWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSSIX30.780.02
+0.07%
SouthernSun Small Cap, I
FLPSX43.75-0.27
-0.61%
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
SBACX28.17-0.29
-1.02%
Touchstone Balanced C
LFGIX35.35-0.58
-1.61%
Lord Abbett Focused Growth I
JSLNX19.76-0.34
-1.69%
Janus Henderson Global Select N

SBNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBNY has been closely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBNY jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBNY
1D Price
Change %
SBNY100%
+3.13%
WAL - SBNY
84%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
FITB - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
SNV - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
OZK - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
BKU - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
More

WF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WF
1D Price
Change %
WF100%
-0.18%
SHG - WF
73%
Closely correlated
-3.73%
KB - WF
69%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
SBNY - WF
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
NWG - WF
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
DBSDY - WF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
More