SBOEF
Price
$33.47
Change
-$3.53 (-9.54%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
970.02M
SNVVF
Price
$3.12
Change
-$0.03 (-0.95%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
210.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBOEF vs SNVVF

Header iconSBOEF vs SNVVF Comparison
Open Charts SBOEF vs SNVVFBanner chart's image
Schoeller Bleckmann Oilfield Equipment AG
Price$33.47
Change-$3.53 (-9.54%)
Volume$800
Capitalization970.02M
Step Energy Svcs
Price$3.12
Change-$0.03 (-0.95%)
Volume$117
Capitalization210.71M
SBOEF vs SNVVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBOEF vs. SNVVF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBOEF is a Hold and SNVVF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (SBOEF: $33.47 vs. SNVVF: $3.12)
Brand notoriety: SBOEF and SNVVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBOEF: 100% vs. SNVVF: 3%
Market capitalization -- SBOEF: $970.02M vs. SNVVF: $210.71M
SBOEF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $970.02M. SNVVF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $210.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBOEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNVVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SBOEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNVVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNVVF is a better buy in the long-term than SBOEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBOEF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNVVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBOEF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SNVVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBOEF is a better buy in the short-term than SNVVF.

Price Growth

SBOEF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNVVF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +7.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.62% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBOEF($970M) has a higher market cap than SNVVF($211M). SBOEF has higher P/E ratio than SNVVF: SBOEF (9.69) vs SNVVF (2.63). SNVVF YTD gains are higher at: 4.698 vs. SBOEF (-32.520). SNVVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 238M vs. SBOEF (144M). SBOEF has more cash in the bank: 302M vs. SNVVF (1.24M). SNVVF has less debt than SBOEF: SNVVF (151M) vs SBOEF (271M). SNVVF has higher revenues than SBOEF: SNVVF (1.03B) vs SBOEF (548M).
SBOEFSNVVFSBOEF / SNVVF
Capitalization970M211M460%
EBITDA144M238M61%
Gain YTD-32.5204.698-692%
P/E Ratio9.692.63368%
Revenue548M1.03B53%
Total Cash302M1.24M24,414%
Total Debt271M151M179%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBOEF vs SNVVF: Fundamental Ratings
SBOEF
SNVVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4690
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8444
SMR RATING
1..100
7291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
661
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBOEF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNVVF (97). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNVVF’s over the last 12 months.

SNVVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBOEF (84). This means that SNVVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SNVVF (91). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to SNVVF’s over the last 12 months.

SNVVF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBOEF (82). This means that SNVVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

SNVVF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBOEF (66). This means that SNVVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBOEFSNVVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEMIX40.68N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity I
NRFNX11.31N/A
N/A
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate N
DHLSX29.72N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
PJNQX60.78N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6
MSPRX24.33N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage C

SBOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBOEF and SAPMY have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBOEF and SAPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBOEF
1D Price
Change %
SBOEF100%
N/A
SAPMY - SBOEF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYTF - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
QSEP - SBOEF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
TAGP - SBOEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNVVF - SBOEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SNVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNVVF and HAL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNVVF and HAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNVVF
1D Price
Change %
SNVVF100%
N/A
HAL - SNVVF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
LBRT - SNVVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
KLXE - SNVVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
NINE - SNVVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
NOV - SNVVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More