SBOEF
Price
$30.56
Change
-$1.59 (-4.95%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
500.75M
TAGP
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.02 (-28.57%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
8.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBOEF vs TAGP

Header iconSBOEF vs TAGP Comparison
Open Charts SBOEF vs TAGPBanner chart's image
SBO AG
Price$30.56
Change-$1.59 (-4.95%)
Volume$901
Capitalization500.75M
Tristar Acquisition Group
Price$0.04
Change-$0.02 (-28.57%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization8.51M
SBOEF vs TAGP Comparison Chart in %
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBOEF vs. TAGP commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBOEF is a Hold and TAGP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SBOEF: $30.56 vs. TAGP: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: SBOEF and TAGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBOEF: 139% vs. TAGP: 21%
Market capitalization -- SBOEF: $500.75M vs. TAGP: $8.51M
SBOEF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $500.75M. TAGP’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $8.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $51.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBOEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAGP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SBOEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAGP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TAGP is a better buy in the long-term than SBOEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBOEF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBOEF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TAGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAGP is a better buy in the short-term than SBOEF.

Price Growth

SBOEF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TAGP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -32.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.86% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBOEF($501M) has a higher market cap than TAGP($8.51M). TAGP YTD gains are higher at: 104.545 vs. SBOEF (-38.387). SBOEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 102M vs. TAGP (-58.87K). SBOEF has more cash in the bank: 279M vs. TAGP (0). TAGP has less debt than SBOEF: TAGP (40.3M) vs SBOEF (373M). SBOEF has higher revenues than TAGP: SBOEF (526M) vs TAGP (0).
SBOEFTAGPSBOEF / TAGP
Capitalization501M8.51M5,887%
EBITDA102M-58.87K-173,254%
Gain YTD-38.387104.545-37%
P/E Ratio10.50N/A-
Revenue526M0-
Total Cash279M0-
Total Debt373M40.3M926%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBOEF vs TAGP: Fundamental Ratings
SBOEF
TAGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
75100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBOEF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (45). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (100). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as TAGP (100). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew similarly to TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TAGP's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBOEF (84). This means that TAGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBOEF’s over the last 12 months.

SBOEF's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAGP (100). This means that SBOEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBOEFTAGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBOEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRXCX16.600.09
+0.55%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq C
FIGFX23.770.12
+0.51%
Fidelity International Growth
NUGIX37.580.16
+0.43%
Nuveen Global Dividend Growth I
TDFCX8.560.03
+0.35%
Transamerica Sustainable Equity Inc C
AWSSX18.290.06
+0.33%
Invesco Global Core Equity R6

SBOEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBOEF and SAPMY have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBOEF and SAPMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBOEF
1D Price
Change %
SBOEF100%
N/A
SAPMY - SBOEF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSYTF - SBOEF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
QSEP - SBOEF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
TAGP - SBOEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNVVF - SBOEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
More

TAGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TAGP and MRC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAGP and MRC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAGP
1D Price
Change %
TAGP100%
N/A
MRC - TAGP
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.32%
QSEP - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
SAPMY - TAGP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYGPY - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOLWF - TAGP
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
More