Investors comparing SBUX and TXRH are effectively weighing two different restaurant-industry narratives. Starbucks Corporation is a global coffee giant attempting to reclaim brand momentum through a disciplined operational turnaround, while Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is a fast-growing casual-dining steakhouse chain built on unit expansion and consistent guest traffic. This stock comparison is relevant to traders and long-term investors seeking to understand how relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning differ between a large-cap consumer staple-adjacent brand and a mid-cap growth operator. Both stocks offer insight into consumer resilience and restaurant-sector economics.
Starbucks (SBUX), the world's largest coffeehouse chain with roughly 41,000 locations globally, has been executing its "Back to Starbucks" turnaround under CEO Brian Niccol. In recent weeks, the company reported fiscal third-quarter results that showed global comparable store sales rising 7.9%, driven by a 4.2% increase in transactions and a 3.5% rise in average ticket. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) climbed 70% year over year to $0.85, and non-GAAP operating margin expanded 430 basis points to 14.4%. Management raised its full-year EPS guidance to a range of $2.55 to $2.65.
Despite these improvements, SBUX shares pulled back in recent market activity amid a broader decline in consumer stocks tied to higher gasoline prices and household-spending concerns. The company also announced plans to close roughly 250 underperforming North American cafes, about 1% of its footprint, with associated restructuring charges of about $300 million. The stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple near 32, with a dividend yield around 2.6%.
Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) is a casual-dining steakhouse operator with more than 830 restaurants across 49 states, one U.S. territory, and ten foreign countries. The company's growth model combines consistent unit expansion with strong same-restaurant sales. In recent results, total revenue rose 11.1% year over year to about $1.68 billion, while average weekly sales reached a record of roughly $175,700. Comparable restaurant sales continued to grow in the mid-single digits, supported by solid traffic gains.
However, margin performance has been tempered by cost pressures. Commodity inflation, driven primarily by beef, was around 5% in the most recent outlook, while wage and other labor inflation ran in the 3% to 4% range. Restaurant margin as a percentage of sales declined modestly as a result. TXRH carries a market capitalization near $10.5 billion and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. The stock has also experienced recent volatility alongside the wider restaurant sector, despite strong underlying sales trends.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform's most promising automated trading strategies. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and target set of securities. Rather than showcasing every available bot, this curated section highlights only those deemed best suited to current market conditions, making it easier for traders to identify strategies aligned with prevailing momentum, volatility, and sector rotation. For investors following names such as SBUX and TXRH, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can provide a data-driven perspective on how algorithmic models are positioning across these and other securities.
These two companies diverge sharply on scale, growth model, and risk profile. SBUX is a large-cap global operator with roughly $108 billion in market capitalization, a mature store base, and a recovery story centered on restoring traffic and expanding margins. Its revenue base is broad, spanning company-operated stores, licensed locations, and packaged coffee, and it recently restructured its China operations into a joint venture. TXRH, by contrast, is a mid-cap growth name with a market capitalization near $10.5 billion, a predominantly U.S. footprint, and a business model built on opening new restaurants and sustaining high traffic at existing ones.
On growth drivers, SBUX is leaning on menu innovation, service improvements, and cost discipline, while TXRH is compounding through store-week growth of 5% to 6% and resilient same-restaurant sales. Risk factors also differ: Starbucks faces consumer-discretionary sensitivity and a premium valuation, whereas Texas Roadhouse faces concentrated exposure to beef-cost inflation and labor expense. From a sector-exposure standpoint, both are tied to restaurant spending, but Starbucks' global diversification contrasts with Texas Roadhouse's domestic concentration and more direct commodity risk.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, catalyst clarity, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor SBUX in the current environment. Starbucks' traffic-led comparable sales growth, expanding operating margin, and upwardly revised profit guidance represent a clearer and more consistent improvement trend, even though its premium valuation leaves limited room for error. TXRH remains a fundamentally strong operator with reliable sales momentum, but persistent commodity-driven margin pressure and a smaller, more concentrated footprint introduce greater uncertainty into its near-term earnings trajectory. The AI's preference for SBUX reflects a probabilistic assessment of trend stability and catalysts rather than a definitive forecast, and relative positioning could shift as new data emerges.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
SBUX | TXRH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SBUX's Valuation (21) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TXRH (31). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to TXRH’s over the last 12 months.
TXRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBUX (100). This means that TXRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBUX’s over the last 12 months.
SBUX's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TXRH (35). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to TXRH’s over the last 12 months.
SBUX's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TXRH (61). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to TXRH’s over the last 12 months.
SBUX's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TXRH (38). This means that SBUX’s stock grew similarly to TXRH’s over the last 12 months.
| SBUX | TXRH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 10 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 72% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SBUX’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while TXRH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SBUX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TXRH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
SBUX (@Restaurants) experienced а -1.76% price change this week, while TXRH (@Restaurants) price change was +3.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.66%.
SBUX is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
TXRH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPIP | 24.46 | 0.08 | +0.33% |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio TIPS ETF (SPIP) | |||
| VIG | 237.39 | 0.40 | +0.17% |
| Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) | |||
| FTWO | 45.16 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) | |||
| DDTJ | 20.70 | -0.02 | -0.10% |
| Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - January (DDTJ) | |||
| HBTA | 33.17 | -0.49 | -1.46% |
| Horizon Expedition Plus ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBUX has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBUX jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBUX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBUX | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| FRSH - SBUX | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| TXRH - SBUX | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CAKE - SBUX | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| DRI - SBUX | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| BLMN - SBUX | 39% Loosely correlated | +3.79% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TXRH has been loosely correlated with DRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TXRH jumps, then DRI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TXRH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXRH | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| DRI - TXRH | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| CAKE - TXRH | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| FRSH - TXRH | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| BLMN - TXRH | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.79% | ||
| BJRI - TXRH | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||