SCABY
Price
$13.31
Change
-$0.19 (-1.41%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.39B
WFG
Price
$75.05
Change
+$2.40 (+3.30%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.94B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCABY vs WFG

Header iconSCABY vs WFG Comparison
Open Charts SCABY vs WFGBanner chart's image
Svenska Cellulosa AB
Price$13.31
Change-$0.19 (-1.41%)
Volume$253
Capitalization9.39B
West Fraser Timber
Price$75.05
Change+$2.40 (+3.30%)
Volume$293.78K
Capitalization5.94B
SCABY vs WFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCABY vs. WFG commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCABY is a Hold and WFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SCABY: $13.31 vs. WFG: $75.05)
Brand notoriety: SCABY and WFG are both not notable
SCABY represents the Pulp & Paper, while WFG is part of the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCABY: 8% vs. WFG: 114%
Market capitalization -- SCABY: $9.39B vs. WFG: $5.94B
SCABY [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $9.39B. WFG’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $5.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.63B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $8.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.63B. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCABY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCABY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFG is a better buy in the long-term than SCABY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCABY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCABY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFG is a better buy in the short-term than SCABY.

Price Growth

SCABY (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -1.39% price change this week, while WFG (@Forest Products) price change was +2.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

WFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.56% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

@Forest Products (+0.67% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCABY($9.39B) has a higher market cap than WFG($5.94B). WFG has higher P/E ratio than SCABY: WFG (57.61) vs SCABY (23.33). SCABY YTD gains are higher at: 20.497 vs. WFG (-12.543). SCABY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.32B vs. WFG (432M). WFG has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. SCABY (74M). WFG has less debt than SCABY: WFG (329M) vs SCABY (544M). SCABY has higher revenues than WFG: SCABY (20.9B) vs WFG (5.83B).
SCABYWFGSCABY / WFG
Capitalization9.39B5.94B158%
EBITDA7.32B432M1,695%
Gain YTD20.497-12.543-163%
P/E Ratio23.3357.6140%
Revenue20.9B5.83B358%
Total Cash74M646M11%
Total Debt544M329M165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WFG: Fundamental Ratings
WFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCABYWFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCABY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSPEX70.440.50
+0.71%
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529E
DIECX45.08N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon International Core Equity C
SMITX33.00N/A
N/A
Invesco Summit R5
TSVAX18.47N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val A
EPLMX22.76N/A
N/A
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield SIMPLE Cl

SCABY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCABY and HMTC have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCABY and HMTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCABY
1D Price
Change %
SCABY100%
N/A
HMTC - SCABY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFG - SCABY
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.30%
IFSPF - SCABY
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.36%
SSD - SCABY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
TCOR - SCABY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFG has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WFG jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFG
1D Price
Change %
WFG100%
+3.30%
BCC - WFG
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
CFPZF - WFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
UFPI - WFG
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
SSD - WFG
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
IFSPF - WFG
46%
Loosely correlated
+5.36%
More