Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCAVX vs SSGSX
SCAVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts SCAVX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
SCAVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCAVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCAVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 4.96B vs. SCAVX (520M). SCAVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: SCAVX (0.94) vs SSGSX (0.49). SCAVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: SCAVX (11 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than SCAVX (1.17). SCAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX initial investment is less costly to investors than SCAVX (4%) vs SCAVX (4%). SCAVX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SCAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.69 vs. SSGSX (-13.94). SCAVX return over 5 years is better than : 21.43 vs. SSGSX (2.50).
| SCAVX | SSGSX | SCAVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.26 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.26 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.915 | -4.243 | 116% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 520M | 4.96B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.49 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.69 | -13.94 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.93 | -10.31 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.43 | 2.50 | 856% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.10 | 12.84 | 273% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers