Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCAVX vs SSGSX
SCAVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts SCAVX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.10
Change-$0.65 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.58B
SCAVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCAVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCAVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.58B vs. SCAVX (566M). SCAVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: SCAVX (0.90) vs SSGSX (0.47). SCAVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: SCAVX (11 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than SCAVX (1.17). SCAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX initial investment is less costly to investors than SCAVX (4%) vs SCAVX (4%). SCAVX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SCAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. SSGSX (-0.91). SCAVX return over 5 years is better than : 54.89 vs. SSGSX (27.21).
| SCAVX | SSGSX | SCAVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.26 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.26 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.433 | 1.443 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 566M | 5.58B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.47 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | -0.91 | -586% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.50 | 1.77 | 706% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.89 | 27.21 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.20 | 23.85 | 215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers