SCEYF
Price
$10.10
Change
-$0.23 (-2.23%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
138.45M
XPRO
Price
$8.65
Change
-$0.26 (-2.92%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.16B
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCEYF vs XPRO

Header iconSCEYF vs XPRO Comparison
Open Charts SCEYF vs XPROBanner chart's image
Source Energy Services
Price$10.10
Change-$0.23 (-2.23%)
Volume$800
Capitalization138.45M
Expro Group Holdings
Price$8.65
Change-$0.26 (-2.92%)
Volume$1.01M
Capitalization2.16B
SCEYF vs XPRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCEYF vs. XPRO commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCEYF is a Hold and XPRO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SCEYF: $10.10 vs. XPRO: $8.65)
Brand notoriety: SCEYF and XPRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCEYF: 8% vs. XPRO: 99%
Market capitalization -- SCEYF: $138.45M vs. XPRO: $2.16B
SCEYF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $138.45M. XPRO’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $2.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCEYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXPRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SCEYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • XPRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCEYF is a better buy in the long-term than XPRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCEYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPRO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCEYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XPRO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCEYF is a better buy in the short-term than XPRO.

Price Growth

SCEYF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -2.21% price change this week, while XPRO (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +2.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

XPRO is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.23% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XPRO($2.16B) has a higher market cap than SCEYF($138M). XPRO has higher P/E ratio than SCEYF: XPRO (961.50) vs SCEYF (1.18). SCEYF YTD gains are higher at: -10.062 vs. XPRO (-30.634). SCEYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 222M vs. XPRO (197M). XPRO has more cash in the bank: 152M vs. SCEYF (3.03M). XPRO has less debt than SCEYF: XPRO (111M) vs SCEYF (222M). XPRO has higher revenues than SCEYF: XPRO (1.51B) vs SCEYF (570M).
SCEYFXPROSCEYF / XPRO
Capitalization138M2.16B6%
EBITDA222M197M113%
Gain YTD-10.062-30.63433%
P/E Ratio1.18961.500%
Revenue570M1.51B38%
Total Cash3.03M152M2%
Total Debt222M111M200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCEYF vs XPRO: Fundamental Ratings
SCEYF
XPRO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9160
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3671
SMR RATING
1..100
5283
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCEYF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as XPRO (52). This means that SCEYF’s stock grew similarly to XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

SCEYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XPRO (71). This means that SCEYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

SCEYF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as XPRO (83). This means that SCEYF’s stock grew similarly to XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

SCEYF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as XPRO (64). This means that SCEYF’s stock grew similarly to XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

SCEYF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for XPRO (100). This means that SCEYF’s stock grew significantly faster than XPRO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCEYFXPRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XPRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LUSIX10.990.04
+0.37%
Lazard US Systematic Small Cap Eq Ins
MAIIX18.65N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx Instl
NBNAX15.70N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
DDVRX14.31N/A
N/A
Macquarie Value R
HWSIX75.34N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I

SCEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCEYF and WFRD have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCEYF and WFRD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCEYF
1D Price
Change %
SCEYF100%
N/A
WFRD - SCEYF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
ACDC - SCEYF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.74%
GZPZY - SCEYF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XPRO - SCEYF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
JUTOY - SCEYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

XPRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XPRO has been closely correlated with HAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XPRO jumps, then HAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPRO
1D Price
Change %
XPRO100%
-2.92%
HAL - XPRO
76%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
SLB - XPRO
74%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
CHX - XPRO
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
WFRD - XPRO
73%
Closely correlated
-1.80%
HLX - XPRO
72%
Closely correlated
+3.01%
More