SCGPY
Price
$2.76
Change
-$0.32 (-10.39%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.01B
SCTBF
Price
$15.99
Change
+$0.24 (+1.52%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
8.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCGPY vs SCTBF

Header iconSCGPY vs SCTBF Comparison
Open Charts SCGPY vs SCTBFBanner chart's image
Serco Group
Price$2.76
Change-$0.32 (-10.39%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization3.01B
Securitas A B
Price$15.99
Change+$0.24 (+1.52%)
Volume$4.64K
Capitalization8.83B
SCGPY vs SCTBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCGPY vs. SCTBF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCGPY is a Hold and SCTBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SCGPY: $2.76 vs. SCTBF: $15.99)
Brand notoriety: SCGPY and SCTBF are both not notable
SCGPY represents the Office Equipment/Supplies, while SCTBF is part of the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCGPY: 259% vs. SCTBF: 87%
Market capitalization -- SCGPY: $3.01B vs. SCTBF: $8.83B
SCGPY [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $3.01B. SCTBF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $8.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.63B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCGPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCTBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCTBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCGPY is a better buy in the long-term than SCTBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCGPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCTBF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCGPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SCTBF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCTBF is a better buy in the short-term than SCGPY.

Price Growth

SCGPY (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -10.39% price change this week, while SCTBF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.94%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.25% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+3.97% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCTBF($8.83B) has a higher market cap than SCGPY($3.01B). SCGPY has higher P/E ratio than SCTBF: SCGPY (40.91) vs SCTBF (15.46). SCGPY YTD gains are higher at: 61.506 vs. SCTBF (23.000). SCTBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.6B vs. SCGPY (346M). SCTBF has higher revenues than SCGPY: SCTBF (160B) vs SCGPY (4.85B).
SCGPYSCTBFSCGPY / SCTBF
Capitalization3.01B8.83B34%
EBITDA346M12.6B3%
Gain YTD61.50623.000267%
P/E Ratio40.9115.46265%
Revenue4.85B160B3%
Total CashN/A6.82B-
Total DebtN/A44.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCGPY vs SCTBF: Fundamental Ratings
SCGPY
SCTBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3587
SMR RATING
1..100
9153
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCTBF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGPY (31). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew similarly to SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCTBF (87). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

SCTBF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCGPY (91). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SCTBF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGPY (45). This means that SCTBF’s stock grew similarly to SCGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGPY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCTBF (97). This means that SCGPY’s stock grew significantly faster than SCTBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCGPYSCTBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
14%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCTBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FVLZX37.600.20
+0.53%
Fidelity Advisor Value Z
FDYNX158.640.49
+0.31%
Franklin DynaTech C
JVSNX16.51N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value N
JORNX20.57-0.01
-0.05%
Janus Henderson Global Select T
USCGX14.33-0.03
-0.21%
Victory Capital Growth

SCGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGPY has been loosely correlated with SECUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGPY jumps, then SECUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGPY
1D Price
Change %
SCGPY100%
N/A
SECUF - SCGPY
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
BMBLF - SCGPY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
CASS - SCGPY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
GHC - SCGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
BRC - SCGPY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More

SCTBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCTBF and NAUH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCTBF and NAUH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCTBF
1D Price
Change %
SCTBF100%
N/A
NAUH - SCTBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUBG - SCTBF
22%
Poorly correlated
-16.26%
SDXOF - SCTBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCGPY - SCTBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSKIA - SCTBF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.86%
More