Ad is loading...
SCHA vs USVM
SCHA vs USVM Comparison
Open Charts SCHA vs USVM
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$25.61
Change-$0.72 (-2.73%)
Volume$2.24M
Net Assets17.95B
VictoryShares US Sm Md Cp Val Momt ETF
Price$82.75
Change-$2.09 (-2.46%)
Volume$199.66K
Net Assets873.95M
SCHA vs USVM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHA vs. USVM commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHA is a Hold and USVM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 17.9B vs. USVM (874M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than USVM: SCHA (-0.967) vs USVM (-1.614). SCHA was incepted earlier than USVM: SCHA (15 years) vs USVM (7 years). USVM has a higher turnover SCHA (9.00) vs SCHA (9.00).
| SCHA | USVM | SCHA / USVM | |
| Gain YTD | -0.967 | -1.614 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 17.9B | 874M | 2,048% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 126.00 | 7% |
| Yield | 1.31 | 1.26 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHA | USVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 85% | 19 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | -2.73% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.57% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.50% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||
USVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USVM has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if USVM jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USVM | 100% | -2.47% | ||
| UFPI - USVM | 83% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| TPH - USVM | 81% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| TMHC - USVM | 80% Closely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| CCS - USVM | 79% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| KBH - USVM | 78% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
More | ||||