Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCHG vs SPUS
SCHG vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts SCHG vs SPUS
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$30.43
Change-$0.07 (-0.23%)
Volume$47.85K
Net Assets47.73B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$46.83
Change-$0.15 (-0.32%)
Volume$1.5K
Net Assets1.48B
SCHG vs SPUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHG vs. SPUS commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Hold and SPUS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 47.7B vs. SPUS (1.48B). SPUS (9.908) and SCHG (9.621) have matching annual dividend yield . SCHG was incepted earlier than SPUS: SCHG (16 years) vs SPUS (6 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| SCHG | SPUS | SCHG / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | 9.621 | 9.908 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 47.7B | 1.48B | 3,232% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.45 | 9% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 18.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.38 | 0.66 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHG | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | +3.10% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| META - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +2.12% | ||
More | ||||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | +1.51% | ||
| AMZN - SPUS | 80% Closely correlated | +3.10% | ||
| NVDA - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| PH - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| MSFT - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| AMD - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | +2.47% | ||
More | ||||