Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCHG vs SPUS
SCHG vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts SCHG vs SPUS
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$29.54
Change-$0.68 (-2.25%)
Volume$12.83M
Net Assets46.36B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$45.32
Change-$0.65 (-1.41%)
Volume$439.41K
Net Assets1.41B
SCHG vs SPUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHG vs. SPUS commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Hold and SPUS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 46.4B vs. SPUS (1.41B). SCHG (6.206) and SPUS (6.024) have matching annual dividend yield . SCHG was incepted earlier than SPUS: SCHG (16 years) vs SPUS (6 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| SCHG | SPUS | SCHG / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.206 | 6.024 | 103% |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 1.41B | 3,286% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.45 | 9% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 18.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.38 | 0.66 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHG | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PFLD | 19.56 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| AAM Low Duration Pref & Inc Secs ETF | |||
| RMCA | 23.37 | N/A | N/A |
| Rockefeller California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| XBJL | 36.18 | -0.25 | -0.69% |
| Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF Jul | |||
| CANQ | 28.68 | -0.29 | -1.01% |
| Calamos Nasdaq® Equity & Income ETF | |||
| DFLV | 30.84 | -0.45 | -1.44% |
| Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF | |||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| AMZN - SPUS | 82% Closely correlated | -8.27% | ||
| ADI - SPUS | 80% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| PH - SPUS | 79% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| LRCX - SPUS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| CDNS - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
More | ||||