Ad is loading...
SCHG vs SPUS
SCHG vs SPUS Comparison
Open Charts SCHG vs SPUS
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$22.61
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
Volume$37.01K
Net Assets31.52B
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
Price$34.99
Change-$0.15 (-0.43%)
Volume$100
Net Assets985.65M
SCHG vs SPUS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHG vs. SPUS commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Hold and SPUS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 31.5B vs. SPUS (986M). SPUS has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: SPUS (-17.995) vs SCHG (-18.934). SCHG was incepted earlier than SPUS: SCHG (15 years) vs SPUS (5 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than SPUS (0.45). SPUS has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| SCHG | SPUS | SCHG / SPUS | |
| Gain YTD | -18.934 | -17.995 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 31.5B | 986M | 3,195% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.45 | 9% |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 18.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.45 | 0.78 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHG | SPUS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -6.11% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -6.44% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -7.09% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -4.15% | ||
| KLAC - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | -7.13% | ||
More | ||||
SPUS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPUS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPUS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPUS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPUS | 100% | -5.36% | ||
| CDNS - SPUS | 77% Closely correlated | -6.44% | ||
| SNPS - SPUS | 76% Closely correlated | -7.09% | ||
| LRCX - SPUS | 75% Closely correlated | -9.40% | ||
| MSFT - SPUS | 75% Closely correlated | -3.56% | ||
| KLAC - SPUS | 74% Closely correlated | -7.13% | ||
More | ||||