Ad is loading...
SCHM vs VFQY
SCHM vs VFQY Comparison
Open Charts SCHM vs VFQY
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$27.98
Change-$0.71 (-2.47%)
Volume$956.3K
Net Assets11.37B
Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF
Price$143.23
Change-$2.89 (-1.98%)
Volume$12.52K
Net Assets396.75M
SCHM vs VFQY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHM vs. VFQY commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHM is a Hold and VFQY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.4B vs. VFQY (397M). VFQY has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: VFQY (1.664) vs SCHM (0.974). SCHM was incepted earlier than VFQY: SCHM (14 years) vs VFQY (7 years). VFQY has a higher turnover SCHM (18.00) vs SCHM (18.00).
| SCHM | VFQY | SCHM / VFQY | |
| Gain YTD | 0.974 | 1.664 | 59% |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 397M | 2,872% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 55.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 1.42 | 1.28 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHM | VFQY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -2.47% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.23% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -7.83% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.63% | ||
More | ||||
VFQY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFQY has been closely correlated with JXN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VFQY jumps, then JXN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VFQY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VFQY | 100% | -1.98% | ||
| JXN - VFQY | 70% Closely correlated | -4.32% | ||
| EQH - VFQY | 67% Closely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| FBIN - VFQY | 67% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| BXC - VFQY | 66% Closely correlated | -8.54% | ||
| GMS - VFQY | 66% Loosely correlated | -4.11% | ||
More | ||||