Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCHM vs XMLV
SCHM vs XMLV Comparison
Open Charts SCHM vs XMLV
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$28.62
Change-$0.13 (-0.45%)
Volume$11.47K
Net Assets11.66B
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
Price$62.35
Change+$0.27 (+0.43%)
Volume$199
Net Assets755.56M
SCHM vs XMLV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHM vs. XMLV commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHM is a Hold and XMLV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.7B vs. XMLV (756M). SCHM has a higher annual dividend yield than XMLV: SCHM (4.871) vs XMLV (4.358). SCHM was incepted earlier than XMLV: SCHM (15 years) vs XMLV (13 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than XMLV (0.25). XMLV has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| SCHM | XMLV | SCHM / XMLV | |
| Gain YTD | 4.871 | 4.358 | 112% |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 756M | 1,548% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.25 | 16% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 70.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 1.43 | 2.87 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHM | XMLV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 10 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||
XMLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMLV has been closely correlated with IRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMLV jumps, then IRT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMLV | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| IRT - XMLV | 77% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| GGG - XMLV | 77% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| STAG - XMLV | 77% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| FR - XMLV | 77% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| MTG - XMLV | 76% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||