Advertisement
SCHYF vs SCHYY
To understand the difference between Sands China Ltd (SCHYF) vs. Sands China Ltd - ADR (SCHYY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SCHYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHYY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SCHYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SCHYY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SCHYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHYY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SCHYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SCHYY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SCHYF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -0.42% price change this week, while SCHYY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +1.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.65%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+3.76% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| SCHYF | SCHYY | SCHYF / SCHYY | |
| Capitalization | 21.3B | 21.3B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 2.31B | 2.15B | 107% |
| Gain YTD | -3.811 | 0.406 | -939% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.85 | 23.11 | 90% |
| Revenue | 7.19B | 7.08B | 102% |
| Total Cash | 1.79B | 303M | 590% |
| Total Debt | 8.15B | 8.16B | 100% |
SCHYF | SCHYY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCHYF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYY (67). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYY’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYY (100). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYY’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYY (11). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYY’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (47). This means that SCHYY’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYY's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (18). This means that SCHYY’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.
| SCHYF | SCHYY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KIE | 59.06 | 0.16 | +0.27% |
| SPDR® S&P Insurance ETF | |||
| QUAL | 189.35 | 0.29 | +0.15% |
| iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | |||
| OPP | 8.63 | 0.01 | +0.12% |
| RiverNorth/DoubleLine Strategic Opportunity Fund | |||
| DVYA | 41.94 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF | |||
| NBJP | 29.60 | -0.08 | -0.28% |
| Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF | |||
SCHYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MCHVF - SCHYF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GXYYY - SCHYF | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.55% | ||
| SCHYY - SCHYF | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.61% | ||
| SJMHF - SCHYF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WYNMY - SCHYF | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.71% | ||
More | ||||
SCHYY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHYY has been closely correlated with GXYYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHYY jumps, then GXYYY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHYY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHYY | 100% | -3.61% | ||
| GXYYY - SCHYY | 81% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| WYNMY - SCHYY | 75% Closely correlated | -3.71% | ||
| WYNN - SCHYY | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| MLCO - SCHYY | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| LVS - SCHYY | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
More | ||||