SCHYF vs SCHYY
To understand the difference between Sands China Ltd (SCHYF) vs. Sands China Ltd - ADR (SCHYY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SCHYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCHYY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SCHYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SCHYY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SCHYF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCHYY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SCHYF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SCHYY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SCHYF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +8.57% price change this week, while SCHYY (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.63%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-2.53% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| SCHYF | SCHYY | SCHYF / SCHYY | |
| Capitalization | 30.9B | 30.9B | 100% |
| EBITDA | -339M | -339M | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 8.961 | -7.795 | -115% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.17B | 2.17B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 766M | 766M | 100% |
| Total Debt | 8.66B | 8.66B | 100% |
SCHYF | SCHYY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCHYY's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (84). This means that SCHYY’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (100). This means that SCHYY’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYF (1). This means that SCHYY’s stock grew similarly to SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYY (40). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYY’s over the last 12 months.
SCHYF's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SCHYY (92). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to SCHYY’s over the last 12 months.
| SCHYF | SCHYY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 56% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SMDD | 9.12 | 0.95 | +11.63% |
| ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 | |||
| IBTJ | 21.27 | -0.10 | -0.49% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Tr ETF | |||
| BMAY | 40.12 | -0.48 | -1.18% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™- May | |||
| CBLS | 26.12 | -0.40 | -1.50% |
| Clough Hedged Equity ETF | |||
| ICF | 59.62 | -2.46 | -3.96% |
| iShares Cohen & Steers REIT ETF | |||
SCHYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHYF | 100% | +8.57% | ||
| MCHVF - SCHYF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GXYYY - SCHYF | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| SCHYY - SCHYF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
| SJMHF - SCHYF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WYNMY - SCHYF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
More | ||||
SCHYY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHYY has been closely correlated with GXYYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHYY jumps, then GXYYY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHYY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHYY | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| GXYYY - SCHYY | 81% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| WYNMY - SCHYY | 75% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| WYNN - SCHYY | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| MLCO - SCHYY | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.52% | ||
| LVS - SCHYY | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.88% | ||
More | ||||