SCHYF
Price
$2.40
Change
-$0.11 (-4.38%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
21.07B
TBTC
Price
$4.75
Change
+$0.05 (+1.06%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
22.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHYF vs TBTC

Header iconSCHYF vs TBTC Comparison
Open Charts SCHYF vs TBTCBanner chart's image
Sands China
Price$2.40
Change-$0.11 (-4.38%)
Volume$800
Capitalization21.07B
Table Trac
Price$4.75
Change+$0.05 (+1.06%)
Volume$5.83K
Capitalization22.04M
SCHYF vs TBTC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCHYF vs. TBTC commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHYF is a Hold and TBTC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (SCHYF: $2.40 vs. TBTC: $4.75)
Brand notoriety: SCHYF and TBTC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCHYF: 15% vs. TBTC: 71%
Market capitalization -- SCHYF: $21.07B vs. TBTC: $22.04M
SCHYF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $21.07B. TBTC’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $22.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $35.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCHYF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTBTC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCHYF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TBTC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCHYF is a better buy in the long-term than TBTC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCHYF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBTC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCHYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TBTC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TBTC is a better buy in the short-term than SCHYF.

Price Growth

SCHYF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -4.38% price change this week, while TBTC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -7.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.25% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHYF($21.1B) has a higher market cap than TBTC($22M). SCHYF has higher P/E ratio than TBTC: SCHYF (21.20) vs TBTC (13.19). TBTC YTD gains are higher at: 30.169 vs. SCHYF (-2.181). SCHYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.05B vs. TBTC (1.8M). SCHYF has more cash in the bank: 985M vs. TBTC (8.04M). TBTC has less debt than SCHYF: TBTC (468K) vs SCHYF (7.09B). SCHYF has higher revenues than TBTC: SCHYF (7.02B) vs TBTC (11.6M).
SCHYFTBTCSCHYF / TBTC
Capitalization21.1B22M95,909%
EBITDA2.05B1.8M114,095%
Gain YTD-2.18130.169-7%
P/E Ratio21.2013.19161%
Revenue7.02B11.6M60,526%
Total Cash985M8.04M12,247%
Total Debt7.09B468K1,514,316%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCHYF vs TBTC: Fundamental Ratings
SCHYF
TBTC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9078
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
1554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1334
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCHYF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as TBTC (31). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to TBTC’s over the last 12 months.

TBTC's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCHYF (100). This means that TBTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCHYF’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TBTC (54). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TBTC’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TBTC (57). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to TBTC’s over the last 12 months.

SCHYF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as TBTC (34). This means that SCHYF’s stock grew similarly to TBTC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHYFTBTC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDQMF0.580.02
+3.05%
Goldquest Mining Corp.
RESCU0.12N/A
N/A
Rescap Liquidating Trust
LVXFF0.26N/A
N/A
Leviathan Gold Ltd.
BDULF0.63N/A
N/A
Bangkok Dusit Medical Services Public Co., Ltd.
HYSNF1.95N/A
N/A
Hysan Development Co., Ltd.

SCHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCHYF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCHYF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHYF
1D Price
Change %
SCHYF100%
-4.38%
MCHVF - SCHYF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - SCHYF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
SCHYY - SCHYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
SJMHF - SCHYF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
WYNMY - SCHYF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More

TBTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBTC and CNTY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBTC and CNTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBTC
1D Price
Change %
TBTC100%
+1.06%
CNTY - TBTC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
BTSBF - TBTC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SJMHY - TBTC
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNMF - TBTC
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
SCHYF - TBTC
8%
Poorly correlated
-4.38%
More