SCIA
Price
$4.35
Change
+$0.28 (+6.88%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
19.73M
SESMF
Price
$50.00
Change
+$2.25 (+4.71%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
478.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCIA vs SESMF

Header iconSCIA vs SESMF Comparison
Open Charts SCIA vs SESMFBanner chart's image
SCI Engineered Materials
Price$4.35
Change+$0.28 (+6.88%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization19.73M
SUSS MICROTEC SE
Price$50.00
Change+$2.25 (+4.71%)
Volume$200
Capitalization478.31M
SCIA vs SESMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SCIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SESMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SCIA vs. SESMF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCIA is a Hold and SESMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (SCIA: $4.35 vs. SESMF: $50.00)
Brand notoriety: SCIA and SESMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SCIA: 109% vs. SESMF: 55%
Market capitalization -- SCIA: $19.73M vs. SESMF: $478.31M
SCIA [@Semiconductors] is valued at $19.73M. SESMF’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $478.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $3.74T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $58.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SCIA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSESMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SCIA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SESMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SESMF is a better buy in the long-term than SCIA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCIA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SESMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SCIA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SESMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SESMF is a better buy in the short-term than SCIA.

Price Growth

SCIA (@Semiconductors) experienced а +3.57% price change this week, while SESMF (@Semiconductors) price change was +4.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (+3.39% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SESMF($478M) has a higher market cap than SCIA($19.7M). SESMF has higher P/E ratio than SCIA: SESMF (15.11) vs SCIA (10.13). SESMF YTD gains are higher at: -1.980 vs. SCIA (-5.435). SESMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 27.4M vs. SCIA (3.06M). SESMF has more cash in the bank: 60.8M vs. SCIA (6.11M). SCIA has less debt than SESMF: SCIA (250K) vs SESMF (19.4M). SESMF has higher revenues than SCIA: SESMF (270M) vs SCIA (24.9M).
SCIASESMFSCIA / SESMF
Capitalization19.7M478M4%
EBITDA3.06M27.4M11%
Gain YTD-5.435-1.980274%
P/E Ratio10.1315.1167%
Revenue24.9M270M9%
Total Cash6.11M60.8M10%
Total Debt250K19.4M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCIA vs SESMF: Fundamental Ratings
SCIA
SESMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7120
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3649
SMR RATING
1..100
5943
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SESMF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as SCIA (45). This means that SESMF’s stock grew similarly to SCIA’s over the last 12 months.

SCIA's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as SESMF (49). This means that SCIA’s stock grew similarly to SESMF’s over the last 12 months.

SESMF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SCIA (59). This means that SESMF’s stock grew similarly to SCIA’s over the last 12 months.

SESMF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SCIA (61). This means that SESMF’s stock grew similarly to SCIA’s over the last 12 months.

SCIA's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SESMF (98). This means that SCIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SESMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCIASESMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SESMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSCI0.07N/A
N/A
Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc.
IRRHF2389.97N/A
N/A
Interroll Holdings SA
ULTHF0.11N/A
-1.49%
United Lithium Corp.
IFSUF12.44-0.46
-3.57%
Infrastrutture Wireless Italiane SPA Azioni
SRHYY0.20-0.01
-4.44%
Syrah Resources Ltd.

SCIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCIA and INTC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCIA and INTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCIA
1D Price
Change %
SCIA100%
N/A
INTC - SCIA
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.25%
NVEC - SCIA
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.16%
RNWEF - SCIA
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROHCF - SCIA
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SILXF - SCIA
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More

SESMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SESMF and ROHCY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SESMF and ROHCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SESMF
1D Price
Change %
SESMF100%
N/A
ROHCY - SESMF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
RNECF - SESMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SCIA - SESMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROHCF - SESMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNECY - SESMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.93%
More