Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCICX vs STPAX
SCICX vs STPAX Comparison
Open Charts SCICX vs STPAX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info C
Price$47.10
Change+$0.12 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.14B
Saratoga Technology & Comm A
Price$22.01
Change+$0.10 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.54M
SCICX vs STPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCICX vs. STPAX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCICX is a Buy and STPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 14.1B vs. STPAX (41.5M). SCICX (0.00) and STPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . SCICX was incepted earlier than STPAX: SCICX (26 years) vs STPAX (28 years). STPAX (2.62) is less costly to investors than SCICX (1.93). SCICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. STPAX (8.00). SCICX has a lower initial minimum investment than STPAX: SCICX (2000) vs STPAX (2500). STPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.10 vs. SCICX (-18.15). SCICX return over 5 years is better than : -5.22 vs. STPAX (-9.87).
| SCICX | STPAX | SCICX / STPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.62 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.62 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.331 | 5.438 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.1B | 41.5M | 33,976% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.15 | -3.10 | 586% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.75 | 15.32 | -24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.22 | -9.87 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.60 | 34.83 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement