Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCICX vs STPAX
SCICX vs STPAX Comparison
Open Charts SCICX vs STPAX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info C
Price$44.99
Change+$0.55 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.42B
Saratoga Technology & Comm A
Price$21.33
Change+$0.26 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.12M
SCICX vs STPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCICX vs. STPAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCICX is a Buy and STPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. STPAX (40.1M). SCICX (0.00) and STPAX (0.00) have matching dividends . SCICX was incepted earlier than STPAX: SCICX (26 years) vs STPAX (28 years). STPAX (2.62) is less costly to investors than SCICX (1.93). SCICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. STPAX (8.00). SCICX has a lower initial minimum investment than STPAX: SCICX (2000) vs STPAX (2500). STPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.66 vs. SCICX (-20.88). SCICX return over 5 years is better than : -13.32 vs. STPAX (-14.97).
| SCICX | STPAX | SCICX / STPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.62 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.62 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.202 | 1.396 | -229% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 40.1M | 33,416% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.88 | -3.66 | 571% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.30 | 1.10 | -1,749% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.32 | -14.97 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.28 | 27.08 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement