Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SCICX vs WSTCX
SCICX vs WSTCX Comparison
Open Charts SCICX vs WSTCX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info C
Price$52.10
Change+$1.37 (+2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.22B
Macquarie Science and Technology C
Price$27.55
Change+$0.47 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
SCICX vs WSTCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCICX vs. WSTCX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCICX is a Buy and WSTCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCICX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. WSTCX (6.42B). SCICX (0.00) and WSTCX (0.00) have matching dividends . SCICX was incepted earlier than WSTCX: SCICX (26 years) vs WSTCX (28 years). SCICX (1.93) and WSTCX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . WSTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. SCICX (39.00). WSTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCICX: WSTCX (1000) vs SCICX (2000). WSTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.94 vs. SCICX (-5.35). SCICX return over 5 years is better than : -7.80 vs. WSTCX (-59.40).
| SCICX | WSTCX | SCICX / WSTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.91 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.91 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.499 | 19.770 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 6.42B | 237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.35 | -3.94 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.46 | -31.32 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.80 | -59.40 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.49 | -42.74 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement