SCMWY vs TLSNY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCMWY is a Hold and TLSNY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SCMWY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLSNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SCMWY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TLSNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SCMWY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLSNY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SCMWY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TLSNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
SCMWY (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -2.00% price change this week, while TLSNY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -0.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
SCMWY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
TLSNY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (-2.34% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| SCMWY | TLSNY | SCMWY / TLSNY | |
| Capitalization | 33.4B | 8.45B | 396% |
| EBITDA | 4.43B | 28B | 16% |
| Gain YTD | -3.206 | 19.421 | -17% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.15 | 20.89 | 87% |
| Revenue | 11.1B | 93.1B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 581M | 7.24B | 8% |
| Total Debt | 1.89B | 63.8B | 3% |
SCMWY | TLSNY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TLSNY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCMWY (88). This means that TLSNY’s stock grew significantly faster than SCMWY’s over the last 12 months.
SCMWY's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLSNY (100). This means that SCMWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLSNY’s over the last 12 months.
SCMWY's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNY (75). This means that SCMWY’s stock grew similarly to TLSNY’s over the last 12 months.
TLSNY's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SCMWY (72). This means that TLSNY’s stock grew similarly to SCMWY’s over the last 12 months.
SCMWY's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLSNY (98). This means that SCMWY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLSNY’s over the last 12 months.
| SCMWY | TLSNY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 40% | 5 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 20% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 55% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TAAHX | 36.00 | -0.12 | -0.33% |
| Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced R | |||
| VCSOX | 24.32 | -0.11 | -0.45% |
| VALIC Company I Intl Sclly Rspnb | |||
| MSIBX | 15.82 | -0.08 | -0.50% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq A | |||
| JFNIX | 67.99 | -0.42 | -0.61% |
| Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences I | |||
| RYVAX | 193.18 | -1.71 | -0.88% |
| Rydex Energy Services H | |||
SCMWY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCMWY has been loosely correlated with SWZCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCMWY jumps, then SWZCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCMWY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCMWY | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| SWZCF - SCMWY | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VOD - SCMWY | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
| TLSNY - SCMWY | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| DTEGY - SCMWY | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
| KKPNY - SCMWY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||
TLSNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLSNY has been loosely correlated with TELNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLSNY jumps, then TELNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLSNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLSNY | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| TELNY - TLSNY | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| TEF - TLSNY | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| DTEGY - TLSNY | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| TIGO - TLSNY | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| VOD - TLSNY | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||