SCND vs SILLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCND is a Hold and SILLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SCND’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSILLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SCND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SILLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
SCND (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -2.55% price change this week, while SILLF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
SCND is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (+1.03% weekly)This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
| SCND | SILLF | SCND / SILLF | |
| Capitalization | 33.3M | 104M | 32% |
| EBITDA | -6.72M | 14.1M | -48% |
| Gain YTD | -0.389 | -27.673 | 1% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 13.11 | - |
| Revenue | 11.2M | 58.8M | 19% |
| Total Cash | 4.46M | 14.4M | 31% |
| Total Debt | 1.36M | 4.37M | 31% |
SCND | SILLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 41 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SILLF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCND (58). This means that SILLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCND’s over the last 12 months.
SILLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SCND (100). This means that SILLF’s stock grew similarly to SCND’s over the last 12 months.
SILLF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SCND (95). This means that SILLF’s stock grew similarly to SCND’s over the last 12 months.
SILLF's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SCND (87). This means that SILLF’s stock grew similarly to SCND’s over the last 12 months.
SCND's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SILLF (41). This means that SCND’s stock grew somewhat faster than SILLF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SCJ | 75.74 | 2.27 | +3.08% |
| iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF | |||
| IGRO | 70.66 | 1.85 | +2.69% |
| iShares International Dividend Gr ETF | |||
| WBIF | 26.45 | 0.25 | +0.95% |
| WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF | |||
| XLC | 91.27 | 0.77 | +0.85% |
| The Comm Svcs Sel Sect SPDR® ETF | |||
| IBTM | 22.46 | -0.17 | -0.75% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Trs ETF | |||
SCND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCND and SOBR have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCND and SOBR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCND | 100% | N/A | ||
| SOBR - SCND | 9% Poorly correlated | -11.15% | ||
| RNSHF - SCND | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QURT - SCND | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SILLF - SCND | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NSCIF - SCND | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SILLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SILLF and NXTBF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SILLF and NXTBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NXTBF - SILLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SCND - SILLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QURT - SILLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOTK - SILLF | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.13% | ||
| LCTC - SILLF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||