It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SDIIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTOPCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SDIIF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOPCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
SDIIF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -5.09% price change this week, while TOPCF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was +9.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -4.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.97%.
This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.
SDIIF | TOPCF | SDIIF / TOPCF | |
Capitalization | 181M | 1.29B | 14% |
EBITDA | 14.1M | 18.2B | 0% |
Gain YTD | -32.198 | 74.364 | -43% |
P/E Ratio | 16.84 | 15.34 | 110% |
Revenue | 56.7M | 208B | 0% |
Total Cash | 3.62M | 21.8B | 0% |
Total Debt | 26.1M | 57.1B | 0% |
SDIIF | TOPCF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TOPCF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as SDIIF (47). This means that TOPCF’s stock grew similarly to SDIIF’s over the last 12 months.
TOPCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SDIIF (94). This means that TOPCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SDIIF’s over the last 12 months.
SDIIF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOPCF (100). This means that SDIIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOPCF’s over the last 12 months.
TOPCF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SDIIF (83). This means that TOPCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SDIIF’s over the last 12 months.
TOPCF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SDIIF (97). This means that TOPCF’s stock grew significantly faster than SDIIF’s over the last 12 months.
SDIIF | TOPCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago18% | 2 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SDIIF and VNT have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SDIIF and VNT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SDIIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SDIIF | 100% | N/A | ||
VNT - SDIIF | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.17% | ||
EQTL - SDIIF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WELX - SDIIF | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
CPTN - SDIIF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
TOPCF - SDIIF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TOPCF and VNT have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TOPCF and VNT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOPCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TOPCF | 100% | N/A | ||
VNT - TOPCF | 19% Poorly correlated | -3.17% | ||
ROBOF - TOPCF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SOTK - TOPCF | 11% Poorly correlated | -11.86% | ||
VAIAF - TOPCF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SDIIF - TOPCF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |